A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers

被引:261
作者
Masi, Giulia [1 ,2 ]
Rickard, William D. A. [2 ]
Vickers, Les [2 ]
Bignozzi, Maria Chiara [1 ]
Van Riessen, Arie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
[2] Curtin Univ, Geopolymer Res Grp, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
关键词
Porosity; Foaming agent; Surfactant; Geopolymers; CEMENT-BASED MATERIALS; PORE STRUCTURE; FLY-ASH; MERCURY POROSIMETRY; INORGANIC POLYMER; TEMPERATURE; INTRUSION; BEHAVIOR; PASTES; SLAG;
D O I
10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.108
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Foaming to reduce the density of geopolymeric materials is increasingly being reported in the literature as it has been shown to be effective in improving their insulating properties. However, there is no consistency in foaming methods and as such this study was performed to compare methods in order to better understand their effect on the properties of geopolymers. A surfactant and two chemical foaming agents (hydrogen peroxide and aluminium powder) were added to a fly ash based geopolymer matrix. Surfactant was also combined with each of the chemical foaming agents in order to stabilise the foam in the geopolymer matrix and to reduce coarse pores. The physical, mechanical and microstructural properties of the low density geopolymers are presented and the effects of the foaming agents' characteristics on the hardened product is discussed, as well as the relative merits of the different procedures to synthesise the foamed geopolymer. It was found that homogeneous microstructures with small pores can be obtained by adding surfactant and hydrogen peroxide. The combination of hydrogen peroxide (0.1 wt%) and surfactant (1.0 wt%) produced geopolymer foams with density and compressive strength values of 0.94 g/cm(3) and 4.6 MPa, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13891 / 13902
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
American Society of Testing Materials, 2011, ASTM C39
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GEOPOLYMERS CHEM APP
[3]   Lightweight concretes of activated metakaolin-fly ash binders, with blast furnace slag aggregates [J].
Arellano Aguilar, R. ;
Burciaga Diaz, O. ;
Escalante Garcia, J. I. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2010, 24 (07) :1166-1175
[4]  
ASHBY M. F., 2000, Metal Foams: A Design Guide
[5]   Thermal behaviour of inorganic geopolymers and composites derived from sodium polysialate [J].
Barbosa, VFF ;
MacKenzie, KJD .
MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2003, 38 (02) :319-331
[6]   Geopolymer foams by gelcasting [J].
Cilla, Marcelo Strozi ;
Colombo, Paolo ;
Morelli, Marcio Raymundo .
CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 40 (04) :5723-5730
[7]   Mercury porosimetry of hardened cement pastes [J].
Cook, RA ;
Hover, KC .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 1999, 29 (06) :933-943
[8]   HYDROGEN PEROXIDE FORMATION IN OXYGEN REDUCTION AT GOLD ELECTRODES .2. ALKALINE SOLUTION [J].
DAMJANOVIC, A ;
GENSHAW, MA ;
BOCKRIS, JO .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1967, 15 (2-3) :173-+
[9]   GEOPOLYMERS - INORGANIC POLYMERIC NEW MATERIALS [J].
DAVIDOVITS, J .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS, 1991, 37 (08) :1633-1656
[10]  
Davidovits J., 2008, GEOPOLYMERS CHEM APP, P498