Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Survival in New Zealand: The Role of Extent of Disease at Diagnosis

被引:63
作者
Jeffreys, Mona [1 ,2 ]
Sarfati, Diana [3 ]
Stevanovic, Vladimir
Tobias, Martin [4 ]
Lewis, Chris
Pearce, Neil [2 ]
Blakely, Tony [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Massey Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] Univ Otago, Wellington Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Minist Hlth, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; SOCIAL DISPARITIES; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENGLAND; WOMEN; WALES; POPULATION; MORTALITY; CONTINUUM;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0685
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We examined socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in New Zealand among 1.32,006 people ages 15 to 99 years who had a cancer registered (1994-2003) and were followed up to 2004. Relative survival rates (RSR) were calculated using deprivation-specific life tables. A census-based measure of socioeconomic position (New Zealand deprivation based on the 1996 census) based on residence at the time of cancer registration was used. All RSRs were age-standardized, and further standardization was used to investigate the effect of extent of disease at diagnosis on survival. Weighted linear regression was used to estimate the deprivation gap (slope index of inequality) between the most and least deprived cases. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival were evident for all of the major cancer sites, with the deprivation gap being particularly high for prostate (-0.15), kidney and uterus (both -0.14), bladder (-0.12), colorectum (-0.10), and brain (+0.10). Accounting for extent of disease explained some of the inequalities in survival from breast and colorectal cancer and melanoma and all of the deprivation gaps in survival of cervical cancer; however, it did not affect RSRs for cancers of the kidney, uterus, and brain. No substantial differences between the total compared with the non-Maori population were found, indicating that the findings were not due to confounding by ethnicity. In summary, socioeconomic disparities in survival were consistent for nearly all cancer sites, persisted in ethnic-specific analyses, and were only partially explained by differential extent of disease at diagnosis. Further investigation of reasons for persisting inequalities is required. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(3):915-21)
引用
收藏
页码:915 / 921
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NIH Pub
[2]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2003, CANC SURV AUSTR 1992
[3]  
Auvinen A, 1997, IARC Sci Publ, P377
[4]  
Aziz Z., 2004, JPMA Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, V54, P448
[5]   Disparities across the breast cancer continuum [J].
Bigby, JA ;
Holmes, MD .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2005, 16 (01) :35-44
[6]  
Blakely T, 2002, NEW ZEAL MED J, V115, P109
[7]   Widening ethnic mortality disparities in New Zealand 1981-99 [J].
Blakely, T ;
Tobias, M ;
Robson, B ;
Ajwani, S ;
Bonné, M ;
Woodward, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (10) :2233-2251
[8]   Inequalities in mortality during and after restructuring of the New Zealand economy: repeated cohort studies [J].
Blakely, Tony ;
Tobias, Martin ;
Atkinson, June .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7640) :371-375
[9]  
Bradley CJ, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P490
[10]  
Cancer Control Taskforce, 2005, NZ CANC CONTR STRAT