Brazil's Amazon Soy Moratorium reduced deforestation

被引:92
作者
Heilmayr, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Rausch, Lisa L. [3 ]
Munger, Jacob [3 ]
Gibbs, Holly K. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Environm Studies Program, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Nelson Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Sustainabil & Global Environm SAGE, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
NATURE FOOD | 2020年 / 1卷 / 12期
关键词
FOREST CONSERVATION; POLICY; LIMITS; RATES;
D O I
10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Between 2004 and 2012, multiple policies contributed to one of the great conservation successes of the twenty-first century-an 84% decrease in the rate of Brazilian Amazon deforestation. Among the most prominent of these policies is the Amazon Soy Moratorium (ASM), an agreement by grain traders not to purchase soy grown on recently deforested land. The ASM inspired widespread adoption of similar zero-deforestation commitments, but its impact is poorly understood due to its overlap with other conservation policies. Here, we apply an econometric triple-differences model to remotely sensed deforestation data to isolate the ASM's impact within Brazil's Arc of Deforestation. We show that the ASM reduced deforestation in soy-suitable locations in the Amazon by 0.66 +/- 0.32 percentage points relative to a counterfactual control, preventing 18,000 +/- 9,000 km(2) of deforestation over its first decade (2006-2016). Although these results highlight potential benefits of private conservation policies, the ASM's success was dependent on complementarities with public property registries and deforestation monitoring. Disentangling the impacts of anti-deforestation interventions from other conservation efforts remains a challenge. An econometric analysis of remotely sensed data reveals the efficacy of the Soy Moratorium in the Brazilian Arc of Deforestation and the extent to which its success relies on complementary policies.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 810
页数:10
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [21] Forest law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon: Costs and income effects
    Boerner, J.
    Wunder, S.
    Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.
    Hyman, G.
    Nascimento, N.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 29 : 294 - 305
  • [22] Post-Crackdown Effectiveness of Field-Based Forest Law Enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon
    Boerner, Jan
    Kis-Katos, Krisztina
    Hargrave, Jorge
    Koenig, Konstantin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [23] Brown J C., 2013, In Environment and the Law in Amazonia: A Plurilateral Encounter
  • [24] Burgess R., 2018, WILDERNESS CONSERVAT, DOI 10.3386/w24861
  • [25] Naming and Shaming for Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
    Cisneros, Elas
    Zhou, Sophie Lian
    Boerner, Jan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [26] Clarke, 2017, 81604 MPRA
  • [27] The Prospects and Limits of Eco-Consumerism: Shopping Our Way to Less Deforestation?
    Dauvergne, Peter
    Lister, Jane
    [J]. ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 23 (02) : 132 - 154
  • [28] Land use patterns and related carbon losses following deforestation in South America
    De Sy, V.
    Herold, M.
    Achard, F.
    Beuchle, R.
    Clevers, J. G. P. W.
    Lindquist, E.
    Verchot, L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [29] The Restructuring of South American Soy and Beef Production and Trade Under Changing Environmental Regulations
    de Waroux, Yann le Polain
    Garrett, Rachael D.
    Graesser, Jordan
    Nolte, Christoph
    White, Christopher
    Lambin, Eric F.
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 121 : 188 - 202
  • [30] Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon
    Dou Yue
    Bicudo da Silva, Ramon Felipe
    Yang Hongbo
    Liu Jianguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 28 (11) : 1715 - 1732