Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes

被引:81
作者
Cortas, GA [1 ]
Mehta, SN [1 ]
Abraham, NS [1 ]
Barkun, AN [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70157-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current recommendations for the use of standard catheters or sphincterotomes for the initial attempt at selective common bile duct cannulation have been made in the absence of prospective comparative data. Methods: A prospective study was carried out in which patients were randomized to undergo cannulation with a standard catheter or a sphincterotome (standard or wire-guided). Multivariate models were constructed to determine significant independent predictors of the success rates of initial and selective cannulation and the number of attempts and time needed to achieve selective cannulation. Results: Eighty-three successive patients were evaluated, 36 were excluded because they had undergone previous therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or a Billroth II operation. Of the 47 patients (28 women, mean age 60.6 +/- 14.5 years), indications for ERCP included suspected bile duct stones in 41 patients, pancreatico-biliary malignancies in 4, and biliary leaks in 2. Eighteen patients were randomized to undergo selective common bile duct cannulation with standard catheter and 29 to standard/wire-guided sphincterotome. Initial common bile duct cannulation for the standard catheter and standard/wire-guided sphincterotome groups wars successful in 12(67% [95% CI: 41%, 87%]) and 28 (97% [95% CI: 82%, 100%]) patients, respectively (95% CI for the difference: -0.57 to -0.03, p = 0.009). Using intention to treat analysis, selective common bile duct cannulation was successful for standard catheter and standard/wire-guided sphincterotome patients in 17(94% [95% CI: 73%, 99%]) and 28 (97% [95% CI: 82%, 100%]) cases, respectively (95% CI for the difference: -0.15 to +0.10, p > 0.05). The mean number of attempts required to achieve selective common bile duct cannulation were 12.4 +/- 6.0 and 2.8 +/- 3.1 (p = 0.0001). The mean time taken to achieve selective common bile duct cannulation was 13.5+/- 6.14 and 3.1 +/- 5.1 minutes (p = 0.0001). Multivariate modeling revealed that the initial choice of catheter was the only significant independent predictor of the time taken and the number of attempts performed to achieve selective common bile duct cannulation (p = 0.0001 for each model). Conclusion: The use of standard/wire-guided sphincterotome was superior to that of standard catheter for the initial attempt at cannulation of the common bile duct. The number of attempts required may bear clinical significance with regard to the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis and warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 779
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: Quality and cost analysis
    Cohen, J
    Haber, GB
    Kortan, P
    Dorais, JAL
    Scheider, DM
    Cirocco, M
    Habib, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [2] PRECUT PAPILLOTOMY - A RISKY TECHNIQUE FOR EXPERTS ONLY
    COTTON, PB
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (06) : 578 - 579
  • [3] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS
    COTTON, PB
    LEHMAN, G
    VENNES, J
    GEENEN, JE
    RUSSELL, RCG
    MEYERS, WC
    LIGUORY, C
    NICKL, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [4] COTTON PB, 1972, LANCET, V1, P53
  • [5] NEEDLE KNIFE PAPILLOTOMY - HOW SAFE AND HOW EFFECTIVE
    DOWSETT, JF
    POLYDOROU, AA
    VAIRA, D
    DANNA, LM
    ASHRAF, M
    CROKER, J
    SALMON, PR
    RUSSELL, RCG
    HATFIELD, ARW
    [J]. GUT, 1990, 31 (08) : 905 - 908
  • [6] ENDOSCOPIC BILIARY THERAPY USING THE COMBINED PERCUTANEOUS AND ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE
    DOWSETT, JF
    VAIRA, D
    HATFIELD, ARW
    CAIRNS, SR
    POLYDOROU, A
    FROST, R
    CROKER, J
    COTTON, PB
    RUSSELL, RCG
    MASON, RR
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1989, 96 (04) : 1180 - 1186
  • [7] Endoscopic papillectomy: A novel approach to difficult cannulation
    Farrell, RJ
    Khan, MI
    Noonan, N
    OByrne, K
    Keeling, PWN
    [J]. GUT, 1996, 39 (01) : 36 - 38
  • [8] Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy
    Freeman, ML
    Nelson, DB
    Sherman, S
    Haber, GB
    Herman, ME
    Dorsher, PJ
    Moore, JP
    Fennerty, MB
    Ryan, ME
    Shaw, MJ
    Lande, JD
    Pheley, AM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) : 909 - 918
  • [9] Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: Efficacy and complications
    Kasmin, FE
    Cohen, D
    Batra, S
    Cohen, SA
    Siegel, JH
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [10] In vitro evaluation of wire integrity and ability to reprocess single-use sphincterotomes
    Kozarek, RA
    Sumida, SE
    Raltz, SL
    Merriam, LD
    Irizarry, DC
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (02) : 117 - 121