Cytarabine plus G-CSF is more effective than cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF as a stem cell mobilization regimen in multiple myeloma

被引:11
作者
Jelinek, Tomas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Adamusova, Lucie [1 ,3 ]
Popkova, Tereza [1 ]
Tvrda, Ivana [1 ]
Smejkalova, Jana [1 ]
Simicek, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Salounova, Dana [1 ]
Kascak, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Mihalyova, Jana [1 ,2 ]
Plonkova, Hana [1 ]
Duras, Juraj [1 ,2 ]
Navratil, Milan [1 ,2 ]
Hajek, Roman [1 ,2 ]
Koristek, Zdenek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Haematooncol, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Ostrava, Fac Med, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Ostrava, Fac Sci, Ostrava, Czech Republic
关键词
COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; DOSE ARA-C; AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION; MARROW-TRANSPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PROGENITOR CELLS; BLOOD; LENALIDOMIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; DEXAMETHASONE;
D O I
10.1038/s41409-018-0396-x
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is currently a standard regimen for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, cytarabine (AraC) in intermediate doses plus G-CSF seems to have a higher mobilization efficacy. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare mobilization using AraC and Cy. Thirty consecutive MM patients were mobilized by Cy + G-CSF, and the subsequent 40 patients by AraC + G-CSF. Both groups were comparable. The target yield of 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (for tandem and 2 additional transplantations) was achieved in 98% (AraC) and 57% (Cy) of patients (p < 0.0001) by 1.2 and 2.1 apheresis (means), and by single apheresis in 83 and 17% of patients, respectively. AraC mobilization resulted in higher peak concentration of CD34+ cells in blood (median 238.0 vs. 87.9/mu L, p < 0.0001) and higher CD34+ yield (median 28.6 x 10(6) vs. 10.4 x 10(6)/kg, p < 0.0001) compared to Cy mobilization. Toxicities were comparable except for thrombocytopenia gr. 4, observed in 50% of patients after AraC (Cy 7%). In view of these results, we conclude that mobilization with AraC plus G-CSF is very effective with acceptable toxicity and could be considered in MM patients with planned or expected higher numbers of transplantations.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1114
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BLOOD
[2]   A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma [J].
Attal, M ;
Harousseau, JL ;
Stoppa, AM ;
Sotto, JJ ;
Fuzibet, JG ;
Rossi, JF ;
Casassus, P ;
Maisonneuve, H ;
Facon, T ;
Ifrah, N ;
Payen, C ;
Bataille, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (02) :91-97
[3]   Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone with Transplantation for Myeloma [J].
Attal, Michel ;
Lauwers-Cances, Valerie ;
Hulin, Cyrille ;
Leleu, Xavier ;
Caillot, Denis ;
Escoffre, Martine ;
Arnulf, Bertrand ;
Macro, Margaret ;
Belhadj, Karim ;
Garderet, Laurent ;
Roussel, Murielle ;
Payen, Catherine ;
Mathiot, Claire ;
Fermand, Jean P. ;
Meuleman, Nathalie ;
Rollet, Sandrine ;
Maglio, Michelle E. ;
Zeytoonjian, Andrea A. ;
Weller, Edie A. ;
Munshi, Nikhil ;
Anderson, Kenneth C. ;
Richardson, Paul G. ;
Facon, Thierry ;
Avet-Loiseau, Herve ;
Harousseau, Jean-Luc ;
Moreau, Philippe .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (14) :1311-1320
[4]   ETOPOSIDE, DEXAMETHASONE, CYTARABINE, AND CISPLATIN IN VINCRISTINE, DOXORUBICIN, AND DEXAMETHASONE-REFRACTORY MYELOMA [J].
BARLOGIE, B ;
VELASQUEZ, WS ;
ALEXANIAN, R ;
CABANILLAS, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (10) :1514-1517
[5]   Peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation with G-CSF alone versus G-CSF and cyclophosphamide after bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma [J].
Chua, Chong Chyn ;
Lim, Hui Yin ;
Chai, Khai Li ;
Ong, Jeremy ;
Sim, Shirlene ;
Wood, Colin ;
Dickinson, Michael ;
Campbell, Philip ;
Hempton, Jennifer ;
King, Hayley ;
Dowsing, Claire ;
Bergin, Krystal ;
Muir, Sharon ;
Gibbs, Simon ;
Grigg, Andrew .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 53 (09) :1116-1123
[6]   Etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine and cisplatin successfully cytoreduces resistant myeloma patients and mobilizes them for transplant without adverse effects [J].
D'Sa, S ;
Yong, K ;
Kyriakou, C ;
Bhattacharya, S ;
Peggs, KS ;
Foulkes, B ;
Watts, MJ ;
Ings, SJ ;
Ardeshna, KM ;
Goldstone, AH ;
Williams, CD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2004, 125 (06) :756-765
[7]   Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma [J].
Desikan, KR ;
Barlogie, B ;
Jagannath, S ;
Vesole, DH ;
Siegel, D ;
Fassas, A ;
Munshi, N ;
Singhal, S ;
Mehta, J ;
Tindle, S ;
Nelson, J ;
Bracy, D ;
Mattox, S ;
Tricot, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (04) :1547-1553
[8]   A comparison of toxicity following two different doses of cyclophosphamide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 116 multiple myeloma patients [J].
Fitoussi, O ;
Perreau, V ;
Boiron, JM ;
Bouzigon, E ;
Cony-Makhoul, P ;
Pigneux, A ;
Agape, P ;
Nicolini, F ;
Dazey, B ;
Reiffers, J ;
Salmi, R ;
Marit, G .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 27 (08) :837-842
[9]   Outcome of a Salvage Third Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma [J].
Garderet, Laurent ;
Iacobelli, Simona ;
Koster, Linda ;
Goldschmidt, Hartmut ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik ;
Bourhis, Jean Henri ;
Krejci, Marta ;
Leleu, Xavier ;
Potter, Michael ;
Blaise, Didier ;
Koenecke, Christian ;
Peschel, Christian ;
Radocha, Jakub ;
Metzner, Bernd ;
Lenain, Pascal ;
Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin ;
Pohlreich, David ;
Grasso, Mariella ;
Caillot, Denis ;
Einsele, Herman ;
Ladetto, Marco ;
Schoenland, Stefan ;
Kroeger, Nicolaus .
BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (07) :1372-1378
[10]  
Gay FM, 2017, P SOC AM CLIN ON S15, V35, P8003