Performance Characteristics of the Whole-Body Discovery IQ PET/CT System

被引:65
作者
Reynes-Llompart, Gabriel [1 ]
Gamez-Cenzano, Cristina [1 ]
Romero-Zayas, Inmaculada [1 ]
Rodriguez-Bel, Laura [1 ]
Vercher-Conejero, Jose L. [1 ]
Marti-Climent, Josep M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Bellvitge, IDIBELL, IDI, PET Unit,Nucl Med Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Clin Univ Navarra, Nucl Med Dept, Pamplona, Spain
关键词
PET/CT; Discovery IQ; NEMA NU 2-2012; Q.Clear;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.116.185561
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the physical performance of a new PET/CT system, the Discovery IQ with 5-ring detector blocks. Methods: Performance was measured using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU2-2012 methodology. Image quality was extended by accounting for different acquisition parameters (lesion-to-background ratios [8:1, 4:1, and 2:1] and acquisition times) and reconstruction algorithms (VUE-point HD [VPHD], VPHD with point-spread-function modeling [VPHD-S], and Q.Clear). Tomographic reconstruction was also assessed using a Jaszczak phantom. Additionally, 30 patient lesions were analyzed to account for differences in lesion volume and SUV quantification between reconstruction algorithms. Results: Spatial resolution ranged from 4.2 mm at 1 cm to 8.5 mm at 20 cm. Sensitivity measured at the center and at 10 cm was 22.8 and 20.4 kps/kBq, respectively. The noise-equivalent counting rate peak was 124 kcps at 9.1 kBq/cm(3). The scatter fraction was 36.2%. The accuracy of correction for count losses and randoms was 3.9%. In the image quality test, contrast recovery for VPHD, VPHD-S, and Q.Clear ranged from 18%, 18%, and 13%, respectively (hot contrast; 10-mm sphere diameter; ratio, 2:1), to 68%, 67%, and 81%, respectively (cold contrast; 37-mm sphere diameter; ratio, 8:1). Background variability ranged from 3.4%, 3.0%, and 2.1%, respectively (ratio, 2: 1), to 5.5%, 4.8%, and 3.7%, respectively (ratio, 8: 1). On Q.Clear reconstruction, the decrease in the penalty term (b) increased the contrast recovery coefficients and background variability. With the Jaszczak phantom, image quality increased overall when a reconstruction algorithm modeling the point-spread function was used, and use of Q.Clear increased the signal-to-noise ratio. Lesions nalyzed using VPHD-S and Q.Clear had an SUVmean of 6.5 +/- 3 and 7 6 3, respectively (P<0.01), and an SUVmax of 11 +/- 4.8 and 12 +/- 4, respectively (P<0.01). No significant difference in mean lesion volume was found between algorithms. Conclusion: Among the various Discovery bismuth germanium oxide-based PET/CT scanners, the IQ with 5-ring detector blocks has the highest overall performance, with improved sensitivity and counting rate performance. Q.Clear reconstruction improves the PET image quality, with higher recovery coefficients and lower background variability.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1161
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET [J].
Ahn, Sangtae ;
Ross, Steven G. ;
Asma, Evren ;
Miao, Jun ;
Jin, Xiao ;
Cheng, Lishui ;
Wollenweber, Scott D. ;
Manjeshwar, Ravindra M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (15) :5733-5751
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 22012 NEMA NU
[3]   Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST [J].
Bettinardi, V ;
Danna, M ;
Savi, A ;
Lecchi, M ;
Castiglioni, I ;
Gilardi, MC ;
Bammer, H ;
Lucignani, G ;
Fazio, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (06) :867-881
[4]   Physical Performance of the new hybrid PET/CT Discovery-690 [J].
Bettinardi, V. ;
Presotto, L. ;
Rapisarda, E. ;
Picchio, M. ;
Gianolli, L. ;
Gilardi, M. C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (10) :5394-5411
[5]   FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
Delgado-Bolton, Roberto ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Giammarile, Francesco ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Eschner, Wolfgang ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Barrington, Sally F. ;
Pike, Lucy C. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Donohoe, Kevin J. ;
Holbrook, Scott ;
Graham, Michael M. ;
Testanera, Giorgio ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Zijlstra, Josee ;
Visser, Eric ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Willemsen, Antoon ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) :328-354
[6]   Performance comparison of two commercial BGO-based PET/CT scanners using NEMA NU 2-2001 [J].
Bolard, Gregory ;
Prior, John O. ;
Modolo, Luca ;
Delaloye, Angelika Bischof ;
Kosinski, Marek ;
Wastiel, Claude ;
Malterre, Jerome ;
Bulling, Shelley ;
Bochud, Francois ;
Verdun, Francis R. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (07) :2708-2717
[7]   Performance measurements for the PET/CT Discovery-600 using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards [J].
De Ponti, E. ;
Morzenti, S. ;
Guerra, L. ;
Pasquali, C. ;
Arosio, M. ;
Bettinardi, V. ;
Crespi, A. ;
Gilardi, M. C. ;
Messa, C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (02) :968-974
[8]   The contribution of PET/CT to improved patient management [J].
Ell, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 79 (937) :32-36
[9]  
Grant K, 2015, J NUCL MED, V56
[10]   Performance Characteristics of a New LSO PET/CT Scanner With Extended Axial Field-of-View and PSF Reconstruction [J].
Jakoby, Bjoern W. ;
Bercier, Yanic ;
Watson, Charles C. ;
Bendriem, Bernard ;
Townsend, David W. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2009, 56 (03) :633-639