A techno-economic comparison between two technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose

被引:184
作者
Piccolo, Chiara [1 ]
Bezzo, Fabrizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, DIPIC Dipartimento Principi & Impianti Ingn Chim, I-35131 Padua, PD, Italy
关键词
Ethanol; Enzymatic process; Syngas fermentation; Process simulation; Financial analysis; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; PROCESS DESIGN; ENERGY RETURN; FUEL ETHANOL; PRETREATMENT; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; PYROLYSIS; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.008
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The conversion of biomass into biofuels can reduce the strategic vulnerability of petroleum-based transportation systems. Bioethanol has received considerable attention over the last years as a fuel extender or even as a neat liquid fuel. Lignocellulosic materials are very attractive substrates for the production of bioethanol because of their low cost and their great potential availability. Two different process alternatives (i.e. the enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation process and the gasification and fermentation process) for the production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstock are considered and analysed. After a rigorous mass and energy balance, design optimisation is carried out. Both processes are assessed in terms of ethanol yield and power generation as well as from a financial point of view. A sensitivity analysis on critical parameters of the processes' productivity and profitability is performed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 491
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials [J].
Ragauskas, AJ ;
Williams, CK ;
Davison, BH ;
Britovsek, G ;
Cairney, J ;
Eckert, CA ;
Frederick, WJ ;
Hallett, JP ;
Leak, DJ ;
Liotta, CL ;
Mielenz, JR ;
Murphy, R ;
Templer, R ;
Tschaplinski, T .
SCIENCE, 2006, 311 (5760) :484-489
[42]   A biomass pyrolysis sub-model for CFD applications [J].
Rostami, AA ;
Hajaligol, MR ;
Wrenn, SE .
FUEL, 2004, 83 (11-12) :1519-1525
[43]   Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economics, and energy policy [J].
Solomon, Barry D. ;
Barnes, Justin R. ;
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (06) :416-425
[44]   Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review [J].
Sun, Y ;
Cheng, JY .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 83 (01) :1-11
[45]   Kinetic modeling of biomass pyrolysis [J].
Varhegyi, G ;
Antal, MJ ;
Jakab, E ;
Szabo, P .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 1997, 42 (01) :73-87
[46]   Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: A tool for determining the status and direction of research and development [J].
Wooley, R ;
Ruth, M ;
Glassner, D ;
Sheehan, J .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1999, 15 (05) :794-803
[47]  
WOOLEY R, 1999, NRELTP50826157
[48]  
Wooley R. J., 1996, Development of an ASPEN PLUS physical property database for biofuels components
[49]   Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies [J].
Wyman, CE ;
Dale, BE ;
Elander, RT ;
Holtzapple, M ;
Ladisch, MR ;
Lee, YY .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 96 (18) :1959-1966
[50]   Rapid high-temperature pyrolysis of biomass in a free-fall reactor [J].
Zanzi, R ;
Sjostrom, K ;
Bjornbom, E .
FUEL, 1996, 75 (05) :545-550