Institutional environment for entrepreneurship in rapidly emerging major economies: the case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea

被引:70
作者
Gupta, Vishal K. [1 ]
Guo, Chun [2 ]
Canever, Mario [3 ]
Yim, Hyung Rok [4 ]
Sraw, Gaganjeet Kaur [5 ]
Liu, Ming [6 ]
机构
[1] Binghamton Univ, Sch Management, Vestal, NY USA
[2] Sacred Heart Univ, John F Welch Coll Business, Fairfield, CT 06825 USA
[3] Univ Fed Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
[4] Hanyang Univ, Seoul 133791, South Korea
[5] Lovely Profess Univ, Jalandhar, India
[6] Qingdao Technol Univ, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
Country institutional profile (CIP); Cross-national invariance; Emerging economies; INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; FUTURE; DISTANCE; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s11365-012-0221-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The country institutional profile (CIP) construct has become the most widely used conceptualization of institutional environment for entrepreneurship. This construct is frequently employed to study institutional forces influencing entrepreneurial activity at the national level. However, relatively little is known about the cross-national equivalence of the construct. Moreover, the institutional environment for entrepreneurship in emerging economies remains largely under-explored. To address these issues, in the current study, we used the most frequently utilized CIP scale to collect data from 809 young adults in four rapidly emerging countries: Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. We examined the invariance of the CIP construct and unraveled differences in perceived institutional profiles among these rapidly emerging economies. Results support the CIP construct as largely invariant in the four REME countries and revealed important differences in specific aspects of institutional environments in these countries. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 384
页数:18
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Ahlstrom D., 2002, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, V26, P53
[2]  
Anholt S, 2008, PLACE BRANDING PUBLI, V4, P1, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.pb.6000088
[3]  
[Anonymous], I AND ORG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ACAD MANAGEMENT P
[5]   A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations [J].
Baker, T ;
Gedajlovic, E ;
Lubatkin, M .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2005, 36 (05) :492-504
[6]   NORMATIVE, SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE PREDICTORS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL INTEREST IN CHINA, VIETNAM AND THE PHILIPPINES [J].
Baughn, C. Christopher ;
Cao, Johnson S. R. ;
Le, Linh Thi My ;
Lim, Victor A. ;
Neupert, Kent E. .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2006, 11 (01) :57-77
[7]  
Brislin R.W., 1981, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, P389
[8]   Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future [J].
Bruton, Garry D. ;
Ahlstrom, David ;
Obloj, Krzysztof .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2008, 32 (01) :1-14
[9]   Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? [J].
Bruton, Garry D. ;
Ahlstrom, David ;
Li, Han-Lin .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2010, 34 (03) :421-440
[10]   Country institutional profiles:: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena [J].
Busenitz, LW ;
Gómez, C ;
Spencer, JW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (05) :994-1003