Effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy in improving arm function after stroke: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:37
作者
Yang, Jheng-Dao [1 ]
Liao, Chun-De [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Shih-Wei [1 ,3 ]
Tam, Ka-Wai [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Liou, Tsan-Hon [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Yu-Hao [1 ]
Lin, Chia-Yun [7 ]
Chen, Hung-Chou [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 291 Jhongjheng Rd, Taipei 235, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch & Grad Inst Phys Therapy, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Med Univ, Shuang Ho Hosp, Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Taipei Med Univ, Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Electric stimulation therapy; stroke; upper extremity (arm); meta-analysis; TRIGGERED NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION; UPPER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION; NERVE-STIMULATION; UPPER-LIMB; SUBACUTE STROKE; MOTOR RECOVERY; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; HAND FUNCTION; PARETIC-HAND; WRIST;
D O I
10.1177/0269215519839165
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of electrical stimulation in arm function recovery after stroke. Methods: Data were obtained from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception until 12 January 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effects of electrical stimulation on the recovery of arm function after stroke were selected. Results: Forty-eight RCTs with a total of 1712 patients were included in the analysis. The body function assessment, Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment, indicated more favorable outcomes in the electrical stimulation group than in the placebo group immediately after treatment (23 RCTs (n = 794): standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.51-0.84) and at follow-up (12 RCTs (n = 391): SMD = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.35-0.97). The activity assessment, Action Research Arm Test, revealed superior outcomes in the electrical stimulation group than those in the placebo group immediately after treatment (10 RCTs (n = 411): SMD = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.39-1.02) and at follow-up (8 RCTs (n = 289): SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.34-1.52). Other activity assessments, including Wolf Motor Function Test, Box and Block Test, and Motor Activity Log, also revealed superior outcomes in the electrical stimulation group than those in the placebo group. Comparisons between three types of electrical stimulation (sensory, cyclic, and electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation) groups revealed no significant differences in the body function and activity. Conclusion: Electrical stimulation therapy can effectively improve the arm function in stroke patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1286 / 1297
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[11]   Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: Coupled bilateral load training [J].
Cauraugh, James H. ;
Coombes, Stephen A. ;
Lodha, Neha ;
Naik, Sagar K. ;
Summers, Jeffery J. .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 27 (01) :17-25
[12]   Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 215 (1-2) :13-19
[13]   Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, SB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 74 (11) :1562-1566
[14]   Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one - Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, S .
STROKE, 2002, 33 (06) :1589-1594
[15]   Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia [J].
Chae, J ;
Bethoux, F ;
Bohinc, T ;
Dobos, L ;
Davis, T ;
Friedl, A .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (05) :975-979
[16]  
Chae J., 2000, Crit. Rev. Phys. Rehabil. Med, V12, P24, DOI [10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v12.i1.10, DOI 10.1615/CRITREVPHYSREHABILMED.V12.I1.10]
[17]   Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the shoulder after acute stroke [J].
Church, Catherine ;
Price, Christopher ;
Pandyan, Anand D. ;
Huntley, Stuart ;
Curless, Richard ;
Rodgers, Helen .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (12) :2995-3001
[18]   Effects of Somatosensory Stimulation on Motor Function After Subacute Stroke [J].
Conforto, Adriana Bastos ;
Ferreiro, Karina Nocelo ;
Tomasi, Camilla ;
dos Santos, Renata Laurenti ;
Moreira, Viviane Loureiro ;
Nagahashi Marie, Suely Kazue ;
Baltieri, Silvia Cristina ;
Scaff, Milberto ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2010, 24 (03) :263-272
[19]   Effects of a 12-hour neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment program on the recovery of upper extremity function in sub-acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial [J].
Cui, Bao-Juan ;
Wang, Dao-Qing ;
Qiu, Jian-Qing ;
Huang, Lai-Gang ;
Zeng, Fan-Shuo ;
Zhang, Qi ;
Sun, Min ;
Liu, Ben-Ling ;
Sun, Qiang-San .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2015, 27 (07) :2327-2331
[20]   Electrical stimulation of the upper extremity in stroke: cyclic versus EMG-triggered stimulation [J].
de Kroon, Joke R. ;
Ijzerman, Maarten J. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 22 (08) :690-697