The Therapeutic Efficacy of Sacroiliac Joint Blocks With Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction Without Spondyloarthropathy

被引:53
作者
Liliang, Po-Chou [1 ]
Lu, Kang [1 ]
Weng, Hui-Ching [2 ]
Liang, Cheng-Loong [1 ]
Tsai, Yu-Duan [1 ]
Chen, Han-Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Yan Chau Shiang 824, Kaohsiung Cty, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, Dept Hlth Management, Yan Chau Shiang 824, Kaohsiung Cty, Taiwan
关键词
sacroiliac joint; sacroiliac joint block; non-spondylarthropathy; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION; PROVOCATION TESTS; LUMBAR FUSION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819e2c78
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Prospective case series. Objective. The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) blocks with triamcinolone acetonide in patients with SIJ pain without spondyloarthropathy. Summary of Background Data. Numerous studies have demonstrated that SIJ blocks with corticosteroid/anesthetic provide long-term pain relief in seronegative spondyloarthropathy. However, only one report on SIJ dysfunction patients without spondyloarthropathy shows promising results. Methods. We conducted a prospective observational study of patients at a University Spine Center from March 2005 to May 2006. The above mentioned SIJ blocks were performed in 150 patients, and dual SIJ blocks confirmed SIJ pain in 39 patients (26%). Results. Twenty-six patients (66.7%) experienced significant pain reduction for more than 6 weeks; the overall mean duration of pain reduction in these responders was 36.8 +/- 9.9 weeks. SIJ blocks were ineffective in 13 patients (33.3%); the mean duration of pain reduction in these patients was 4.4 +/- 1.8 weeks. Univariate analysis revealed that treatment failure was significantly associated with a history of lumbar/lumbosacral fusion (P = 0.03). Conclusion. SIJ blocks with triamcinolone acetonide are beneficial for some patients with SIJ pain without spondyloarthropathy. The SIJ blocks showed a long-lasting efficacy in two-thirds of the patients; however, the duration of its efficacy was shorter in patients with a history of lumbar/lumbosacral fusion. These findings suggest the need for further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 900
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BOGDUK N, 2004, PRACTICE GUIDELINES, P66
[2]  
Chakraverty Robin, 2004, Acupunct Med, V22, P207
[3]   Sacroiliac joint pain: A comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Cohen, SP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (05) :1440-1453
[4]   Fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint injections [J].
Dussault, RG ;
Kaplan, PA ;
Anderson, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) :273-277
[5]   A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale [J].
Fritz, JM ;
Irrgang, JJ .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2001, 81 (02) :776-788
[6]   Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion - A prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up [J].
Ha, Kee-Yong ;
Lee, Jun-Seok ;
Kim, Ki-Won .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (11) :1192-1198
[7]  
Hudson-Cook N., 1989, Back Pain: New Approaches to Rehabilitation and Education, P187
[8]   Age, body mass index, and gender differences in sacroiliac joint pathology [J].
Irwin, Robert W. ;
Watson, Todd ;
Minick, Ryan P. ;
Ambrosius, Walter T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2007, 86 (01) :37-44
[9]   The sacroiliac joint: A potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrum [J].
Katz, V ;
Schofferman, J ;
Reynolds, J .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2003, 16 (01) :96-99
[10]   Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: A validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests [J].
Laslett, M ;
Young, SB ;
Aprill, CN ;
McDonald, B .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2003, 49 (02) :89-97