NATURE, RELIGION, AND IMAGINATION: COMMENTS ON IMAGES OF HISTORY

被引：0

作者：

Clewis, Robert R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Gwynedd Mercy Univ, Gwynedd Valley, PA 19437 USA

来源：

HISTORY AND THEORY | 2018年 / 57卷 / 03期

关键词：

action; nature; teleology; religion; reason; ideas; imagination;

D O I：

10.1111/hith.12074

中图分类号：

K [历史、地理];

学科分类号：

06 ;

摘要：

After sharing some reflections, I raise three questions. The first asks about the role of nature and reason according to Kant's teleological history, and the extent to which Kant's essays written before the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790) are "dogmatic," as his phrase "aim of nature" might suggest. The second asks about Kant' s "impure" ethics and the role of religion. What would Kantian religion look like today? The last question concerns the relation between images and ideas-a thornier issue than Kant's initial definitions of imagination and reason would seem to suggest.

引用

页码：419 / 425

页数：7

共 8 条

[1]

Ackrill John L., 1987, NEW ARISTOTLE READER

[2]

Clewis R., 2018, Kant and the Faculty of Feeling, P184

[3]

Clewis Robert R., 2016, KANT-STUD, V107, pl

[4]

Clewis RR, 2009, KANTIAN SUBLIME AND THE REVELATION OF FREEDOM, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511576492

[5]

Guyer P., 1992, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant

[6]

Louden RobertB., 2002, Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings

[7] Nietzsche, intention, action [J].

Nehamas, Alexander .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2018, 26 (02) :685-701

[8]

Stevenson Leslie, 2006, KANT NEW PHILOS RELI, P227

← 1 →