Explaining the Ambiguous Relations Between Income, Environmental Knowledge, and Environmentally Significant Behavior

被引:49
作者
Otto, Siegmar [1 ]
Neaman, Alexander [2 ]
Richards, Barbara [2 ]
Mario, Andres [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Inst Psychol, POB 4120, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Fac Agron, Area Medio Ambiente, Quillota, Chile
[3] Univ Metropolitana Ciencias Educ, Dept Formac Pedagog, Santiago, Chile
关键词
proenvironmental behavior; environmental knowledge; environmentally significant behavior; socioeconomic status; recycling; income; travel mode choice; Environmental impact;
D O I
10.1080/08941920.2015.1037410
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The effects of income on environmentally significant behavior (i.e., behavior that does have an effect on the environment, such as traveling and waste disposal) have been strong but equivocal. The relation between knowledge and environmentally significant behavior has attracted even greater interest, but relations have been weak and explanations diverse. These findings have been based on samples in industrialized countries with relatively narrow income distributions, and this may have attenuated a clear understanding of the relations between income, environmental knowledge, and environmentally significant behavior. Using a Chilean sample (N=1785) with a relatively wide income distribution, we found a parsimonious explanation for the ambiguous results of previous studies. Income had a much stronger and differential effect on environmentally significant behaviors, suggesting that when income affects the situation that influences behavior, it trumps knowledge or attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 632
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
AIM, 2008, GRUP SOC 2008
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Cutting class: Socioeconomic status and education
[3]  
Arcury T.A., 1987, Journal of Environmental Education, V18, P31, DOI DOI 10.1080/00958964.1987.9942746
[4]   THE SOCIAL-CONTEXT OF RECYCLING [J].
DERKSEN, L ;
GARTRELL, J .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 58 (03) :434-442
[5]   Human-Environment System Knowledge: A Correlate of Pro-Environmental Behavior [J].
Diaz-Siefer, Pablo ;
Neaman, Alexander ;
Salgado, Eduardo ;
Celis-Diez, Juan L. ;
Otto, Siegmar .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (11) :15510-15526
[6]   Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample [J].
Frick, J ;
Kaiser, FG ;
Wilson, M .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2004, 37 (08) :1597-1613
[7]   Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior [J].
Gatersleben, B ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2002, 34 (03) :335-362
[8]  
Geiger S.M., 2014, Psyecol. Biling. J. Environ. Psychol, V5, P1, DOI 10.1080/21711976.2014.881664
[9]   Accuracy of self-reports: Validating the general ecological behavior scale [J].
Kaiser, FG ;
Frick, J ;
Stoll-Kleemann, S .
DIAGNOSTICA, 2001, 47 (02) :88-95
[10]   Environmental worldview and behavior - Consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians [J].
Nooney, JG ;
Woodrum, E ;
Hoban, TJ ;
Clifford, WB .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 35 (06) :763-783