Adaptive Clinical Trial Design

被引:90
作者
Chow, Shein-Chung [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 65 | 2014年 / 65卷
关键词
group sequential design; adaptive dose-finding design; phase I/II adaptive seamless design; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; SAMPLE-SIZE;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-med-092012-112310
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In recent years, the use of adaptive design methods in clinical trials based on accumulated data at interim has received much attention because of its flexibility and efficiency in pharmaceutical/clinical development. In practice, adaptive design may provide the investigators a second chance to modify or redesign the trial while the study is still ongoing. However, it is a concern that a shift in target patient population may occur after significant adaptations are made. In addition, the overall type I error rate may not be preserved. Moreover, the results may not be reliable and hence are difficult to interpret. As indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance on adaptive design clinical trials, the adaptive design has to be a prospectively planned opportunity and should be based on information collected within the study, with or without formal statistical hypothesis testing. This article reviews the relative advantages, limitations, and feasibility of commonly considered adaptive designs in clinical trials. Statistical concerns when implementing adaptive designs are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 415
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis
[2]   Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework [J].
Atkinson, AJ ;
Colburn, WA ;
DeGruttola, VG ;
DeMets, DL ;
Downing, GJ ;
Hoth, DF ;
Oates, JA ;
Peck, CC ;
Schooley, RT ;
Spilker, BA ;
Woodcock, J ;
Zeger, SL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (03) :89-95
[3]  
BARTLETT RH, 1985, PEDIATRICS, V76, P479
[4]  
Bauer P, 1996, BIOMETRICS, V52, P380
[5]  
Berry D.A., 1996, Bayesian Biostatistics
[6]   ADAPTIVE ASSIGNMENT VERSUS BALANCED RANDOMIZATION IN CLINICAL-TRIALS - A DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BERRY, DA ;
EICK, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (03) :231-246
[7]  
Berry SM, 2010, CH CRC BIOSTAT SER, P1, DOI 10.1201/EBK1439825488
[8]   Estimating a treatment effect in survival studies in which patients switch treatment [J].
Branson, M ;
Whitehead, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (17) :2449-2463
[9]  
Charkravarty A., 2005, EVALUATION SURROGATE
[10]   Statistical consideration of adaptive methods in clinical development [J].
Chow, SC ;
Chang, M ;
Pong, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2005, 15 (04) :575-591