Can artificial intelligence reduce the interval cancer rate in mammography screening?

被引:64
作者
Lang, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Hofvind, Solveig [3 ,4 ]
Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro [5 ]
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Inga Maria Nilssons Gata 47, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Unilabs Mammog Unit, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 22, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, PO 5313, N-0304 Oslo, Norway
[5] ScreenPoint Med BV, Toernooiveld 300, NL-6525 EC Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Mammography; Mass screening; Breast cancer; Artificial intelligence;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-07686-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate whether artificial intelligence (AI) can reduce interval cancer in mammography screening. Materials and methods Preceding screening mammograms of 429 consecutive women diagnosed with interval cancer in Southern Sweden between 2013 and 2017 were analysed with a deep learning-based AI system. The system assigns a risk score from 1 to 10. Two experienced breast radiologists reviewed and classified the cases in consensus as true negative, minimal signs or false negative and assessed whether the AI system correctly localised the cancer. The potential reduction of interval cancer was calculated at different risk score thresholds corresponding to approximately 10%, 4% and 1% recall rates. Results A statistically significant correlation between interval cancer classification groups and AI risk score was observed (p < .0001). AI scored one in three (143/429) interval cancer with risk score 10, of which 67% (96/143) were either classified as minimal signs or false negative. Of these, 58% (83/143) were correctly located by AI, and could therefore potentially be detected at screening with the aid of AI, resulting in a 19.3% (95% CI 15.9-23.4) reduction of interval cancer. At 4% and 1% recall thresholds, the reduction of interval cancer was 11.2% (95% CI 8.5-14.5) and 4.7% (95% CI 3.0-7.1). The corresponding reduction of interval cancer with grave outcome (women who died or with stage IV disease) at risk score 10 was 23% (8/35; 95% CI 12-39). Conclusion The use of AI in screen reading has the potential to reduce the rate of interval cancer without supplementary screening modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:5940 / 5947
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue [J].
Bakker, Marije F. ;
de Lange, Stephanie V. ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Peeters, Petra H. M. ;
Monninkhof, Evelyn M. ;
Emaus, Marleen J. ;
Loo, Claudette E. ;
Bisschops, Robertus H. C. ;
Lobbes, Marc B. I. ;
de Jong, Matthijn D. F. ;
Duvivier, Katya M. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
van Diest, Paul J. ;
Mali, Willem P. T. M. ;
van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J. ;
Veldhuis, Wouter B. ;
van Gils, Carla H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (22) :2091-2102
[2]   Learning from unbalanced data: A cascade-based approach for detecting clustered microcalcifications [J].
Bria, A. ;
Karssemeijer, N. ;
Tortorella, F. .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2014, 18 (02) :241-252
[3]   Going from double to single reading for screening exams labeled as likely normal by AI: what is the impact? [J].
Christiana, Balta ;
Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro ;
Mieskes, Christoph ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Heywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia H. .
15TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI2020), 2020, 11513
[4]   Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis [J].
Ciatto, S. ;
Houssami, N. ;
Ambrogetti, D. ;
Bonardi, R. ;
Collini, G. ;
Del Turco, M. Rosselli .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 105 (01) :37-43
[5]   Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Visioli, C ;
Paci, E ;
Zappa, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (02) :393-396
[6]   Interval Cancers and Duty of Candour, a UK Perspective [J].
Cornford, Eleanor ;
Sharma, Nisha .
CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2019, 11 (02) :89-93
[7]   If You Don't Find It Often, You Often Don't Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer Screening [J].
Evans, Karla K. ;
Birdwell, Robyn L. ;
Wolfe, Jeremy M. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05)
[8]   Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Colombet, M. ;
Soerjomataram, I. ;
Dyba, T. ;
Randi, G. ;
Bettio, M. ;
Gavin, A. ;
Visser, O. ;
Bray, F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 103 :356-387
[9]   Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: Retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program [J].
Hofvind, S ;
Skaane, P ;
Vitak, B ;
Wang, H ;
Thoresen, S ;
Eriksen, L ;
Bjorndal, H ;
Braaten, A ;
Bjurstam, N .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (02) :437-443
[10]   Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes [J].
Houssami, N ;
Irwig, L ;
Ciatto, S .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) :259-265