Managing Biodiversity Through Stakeholder Involvement: Why, Who, and for What Initiatives?

被引:105
作者
Boiral, Olivier [1 ]
Heras-Saizarbitoria, Inaki [2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Business Adm, Dept Management, Pavillon Palasis Prince,Local 1638, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Univ Coll Business Studies, Dept Management, Plaza Onati 1, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
Biodiversity management; Forestry; Inter-organizational collaboration; Mining; Stakeholder theory; Sustain ability; CORPORATE DISCLOSURE; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; IDENTIFICATION; ORGANIZATIONS; INDICATORS; ALLIANCES; BUSINESS; STRATEGY; MYTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-015-2668-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The increasing pressures to conserve biodiversity-particularly for industries based on the exploitation of natural resources-have reinforced the need to implement specific measures in this area. Corporate commitment to preserving biodiversity is increasingly scrutinized by stakeholders and now represents an important aspect of business ethics. Although stakeholder involvement is often essential to the management of biodiversity, very few studies in the literature have focused on the details of this involvement. The objective of this paper is to analyze how mining and forestry companies can manage biodiversity issues through stakeholder involvement based on a content analysis of 430 sustainability reports using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. The paper elucidates the reasons for such involvement, the nature of stakeholders involved, and the types of measures employed to manage biodiversity. Stakeholders' motives for becoming involved revolve around four main issues: complexity and knowledge management; self-regulation and relationships with public authorities; legitimacy and social responsiveness; and commercial and strategic objectives. The stakeholders involved in biodiversity initiatives are essentially non-governmental organizations, experts and universities, public authorities, and coalitions of companies. In the end, the initiatives identified can be grouped into three categories: management practices, socio-political actions, and research and conservation measures. The paper provides various examples of these initiatives and shows how they can be implemented in collaboration with different stakeholders depending on the company's objectives. The contributions the study makes to the literature on biodiversity management and the managerial implications of the study are analyzed in the discussion section.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 421
页数:19
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GLOB BIOD OUTL 3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, International survey of corporate responsibility reporting
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LIVING PLANET REPORT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, SUST REP GUID
[5]   Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry [J].
Azapagic, A .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2004, 12 (06) :639-662
[6]   Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment [J].
Bansal, P ;
Clelland, I .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (01) :93-103
[7]   Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm's commitment to the natural environment [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
Kistruck, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 67 (02) :165-180
[8]   Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? [J].
Boiral, Olivier .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (01) :127-146
[9]   Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A plus GRI reports [J].
Boiral, Olivier .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (07) :1036-1071
[10]  
Bonini S., 2010, The next environmental issue for business: McKinsey global survey results