共 50 条
Individualized and institutionalized residential place-based discrimination and self-rated health: a cross-sectional study of the working-age general population in Osaka city, Japan
被引:7
作者:
Tabuchi, Takahiro
[1
,2
]
Nakaya, Tomoki
[3
]
Fukushima, Wakaba
[4
]
Matsunaga, Ichiro
[4
]
Ohfuji, Satoko
[4
]
Kondo, Kyoko
[4
]
Inui, Miki
[4
]
Sayanagi, Yuka
[4
]
Hirota, Yoshio
[4
]
Kawano, Eiji
[5
]
Fukuhara, Hiroyuki
[6
]
机构:
[1] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Ctr Canc Control & Stat, Higashinari Ku, Osaka 5378511, Japan
[2] Osaka City Univ, Sumiyoshi Ku, Osaka 5588585, Japan
[3] Ritsumeikan Univ, Dept Geog, Coll Letters, Kita Ku, Kyoto 6038577, Japan
[4] Osaka City Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Fac Med, Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
[5] Osaka City Univ, Dept Sociol, Sumiyoshi Ku, Osaka 5588585, Japan
[6] Osaka City Univ, Dept Econ, Sumiyoshi Ku, Osaka 5588585, Japan
来源:
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
|
2014年
/
14卷
关键词:
Place-based discrimination;
Self-rated health;
Osaka city in Japan;
Multilevel analysis;
Individualized and institutionalized pathways;
RACIAL-DISCRIMINATION;
MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS;
NEW-ZEALAND;
DEPRIVATION;
INEQUALITIES;
MORTALITY;
INDEX;
AREA;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
SEGREGATION;
D O I:
10.1186/1471-2458-14-449
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background: Several studies have reported that individualized residential place-based discrimination (PBD) affects residents' health. However, studies exploring the association between institutionalized PBD and health are scarce, especially in Asian countries including Japan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with random two-stage sampling of 6191 adults aged 25-64 years in 100 census tracts across Osaka city in 2011. Of 3244 respondents (response rate 52.4%), 2963 were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression to examine the association of both individualized and institutionalized PBD with self-rated health (SRH) after adjustment for individual-level factors such as socioeconomic status (SES). An area-level PBD indicator was created by aggregating individual-level PBD responses in each tract, representing a proxy for institutionalized PBD, i.e., the concept that living in a stigmatized neighborhood affects neighborhood health. 100 tracts were divided into quartiles in order. The health impact of area-level PBD was compared with that of area-level SES indicators (quartile) such as deprivation. Results: After adjustment for individual-level PBD, the highest and third area-level PBD quartiles showed odds ratio (OR) 1.57 (95% credible interval: 1.13-2.18) and 1.38 (0.99-1.92), respectively, for poor SRH compared with the lowest area-level PBD quartile. In a further SES-adjusted model, ORs of area-level PBD (highest and third quartile) were attenuated to 1.32 and 1.31, respectively, but remained marginally significant, although those of the highest area-level not-home-owner (census-based indicator) and deprivation index quartiles were attenuated to 1.26 and 1.21, respectively, and not significant. Individual-level PBD showed significant OR 1.89 (1.33-2.81) for poor SRH in an age, sex, PBD and SES-adjusted model. Conclusion: Institutionalized PBD may be a more important environmental determinant of SRH than other area-level SES indicators such as deprivation. Although it may have a smaller health impact than individualized PBD, attention should be paid to invisible and unconscious aspects of institutionalized PBD to improve residents' health.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文