GeoCBI: A modified version of the Composite Burn Index for the initial assessment of the short-term burn severity from remotely sensed data

被引:160
作者
De Santis, Angela [1 ]
Chuvieco, Emilio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Geog, Madrid 28801, Spain
关键词
Forest fire; Burn severity; CBI; GeoCBI; Simulation analysis; PROSPECT; GeoSail; Spectral indices; FIRE SEVERITY; LANDSAT TM; PERFORMANCE; LANDSCAPE; SOILS; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Burn severity estimation is a key factor in the post-fire management. Previous studies using remotely sensed data to retrieve burn severity, as measured by the Composite Burn Index (CBI), have found inconsistencies, since spectral indices work well in some ecosystems but not in others. These inconsistencies may be caused by the lack of spectral uniqueness in the CBI definition, or by the performance of the spectral indices used. This paper analyses the former aspect, using a simulation analysis to study the relationships between the CBI and reflectance. Subsequently, a modified version of this index, called GeoCBI, is proposed to improve the retrieval of burn severity from remotely sensed data. GeoCBI takes into account the fraction of cover (FCOV) of the different vegetation strata used to compute the CBI. Moreover, it also includes the changes in the leaf area index (LAI) for the intermediate and tall tree strata (D+E). Field and simulation results show that GeoCBI is more consistently related to spectral reflectance than CBI for different ranges of burn severities, while keeping its ecological meaning. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 562
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning [J].
Andreae, MO ;
Merlet, P .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2001, 15 (04) :955-966
[2]  
Bobbe T., 2001, Field Measurements for the Training and Validation of Burn Severity Maps from Spaceborne, Remotely Sensed Imagery Principal Investigators
[3]   Classifying and mapping wildfire severity: A comparison of methods [J].
Brewer, CK ;
Winne, JC ;
Redmond, RL ;
Opitz, DW ;
Mangrich, MV .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 71 (11) :1311-1320
[4]  
Ceccato P, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V82, P198, DOI [10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00036-6, 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00037-8]
[5]   Fire severity and tree seedling establishment in Abies magnifica forests, southern Cascades, Oregon [J].
Chappell, CB ;
Agee, JK .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (02) :628-640
[6]  
CHUVIECO E, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES, V111, DOI DOI 10.1029/2005JG000143(G04S09)
[7]  
Chuvieco E., 2007, Fire Ecology, V3, P129, DOI DOI 10.4996/FIREECOLOGY.0301129
[8]   Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data [J].
Cocke, AE ;
Fulé, PZ ;
Crouse, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2005, 14 (02) :189-198
[9]   Short-term assessment of burn severity using the inversion of PROSPECT and GeoSail models [J].
De Santis, Angela ;
Chuvieco, Emilio ;
Vaughan, Patrick J. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 (01) :126-136
[10]   Burn severity estimation from remotely sensed data: Performance of simulation versus empirical models [J].
De Santis, Angela ;
Chuvieco, Emilio .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 108 (04) :422-435