Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term:: Comparison of newborn infant outcomes

被引:111
作者
Kolas, Toril [1 ]
Saugstad, Ola D.
Daltveit, Anne K.
Nilsen, Stein T.
Oian, Pal
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, N-2629 Lillehammer, Norway
[2] Univ Hosp Oslo, Rikshosp, Dept Pediat Res, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Bergen, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, Sect Epidemiol & Med Stat, Bergen, Norway
[4] Med Birth Registry Norway, Bergen, Norway
[5] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stavanger, Norway
[6] Univ Hosp N Norway, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tromso, Norway
关键词
cesarean delivery; mode of delivery; neonatal outcome;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine neonatal outcomes among women with a planned cesarean and a planned vaginal delivery at term. Study design: This prospective survey was conducted on 18,653 singleton deliveries that represent 24 maternity units during a 6-month period. The data were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and analyzed according to intended mode of delivery. Results: Compared with planned vaginal deliveries, planned cesarean delivery increased transfer rates to the neonatal intensive care unit from 5.2% to 9.8% (P < .001). The risk for pulmonary disorders (transient tachypnea of the newborn infant and respiratory distress syndrome) rose from 0.8% to 1.6% (P = .01). There were no significant differences in the risks for low Apgar score and neurologic symptoms. Conclusion: A planned cesarean delivery doubled both the rate of transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and the risk for pulmonary disorders, compared with a planned vaginal delivery. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1538 / 1543
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors [J].
Bergholt, T ;
Stenderup, JK ;
Vedsted-Jakobsen, A ;
Helm, P ;
Lenstrup, C .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (03) :251-256
[2]  
*DEP HLTH, NAT HLTH SERV MAT ST
[3]  
Devendra K, 2003, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V32, P577
[4]   Once a pregnancy, always a cesarean? Rationale and feasibility of a randomized controlled trial [J].
Ecker, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (02) :314-318
[5]   Estimating the effect of cesarean section rate on health outcome -: Evidence from Swedish hospital data [J].
Eckerlund, I ;
Gerdtham, UG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (01) :123-135
[6]   Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section ("section on request"): evidence based or modem vogue? [J].
Grisaru, S ;
Samueloff, A .
CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 31 (03) :409-+
[7]   Complications of cesarean deliveries:: Rates and risk factors [J].
Häger, RME ;
Daltveit, AK ;
Hofoss, D ;
Nilsen, ST ;
Kolaas, T ;
Oian, P ;
Henriksen, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (02) :428-434
[8]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[9]   Pregnancy-related death and health care services [J].
Harper, MA ;
Byington, RP ;
Espeland, MA ;
Naughton, M ;
Meyer, R ;
Lane, K .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (02) :273-278
[10]  
Heit M, 2001, Curr Womens Health Rep, V1, P72