Alzheimer's Disease Assessment: A Review and Illustrations Focusing on Item Response Theory Techniques

被引:12
作者
Balsis, Steve [1 ]
Choudhury, Tabina K. [1 ]
Geraci, Lisa [1 ]
Benge, Jared F. [2 ,3 ]
Patrick, Christopher J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
[2] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Temple, TX USA
[3] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Temple, TX USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; assessment; biomarkers; neuropsychology; item response theory; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT; BOSTON NAMING TEST; RATING-SCALE SUM; ADAS-COG; ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS; DIAGNOSTIC GUIDELINES; HYPOTHETICAL MODEL; NATIONAL INSTITUTE; DEMENTIA;
D O I
10.1177/1073191117745125
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects neurological, cognitive, and behavioral processes. Thus, to accurately assess this disease, researchers and clinicians need to combine and incorporate data across these domains. This presents not only distinct methodological and statistical challenges but also unique opportunities for the development and advancement of psychometric techniques. In this article, we describe relatively recent research using item response theory (IRT) that has been used to make progress in assessing the disease across its various symptomatic and pathological manifestations. We focus on applications of IRT to improve scoring, test development (including cross-validation and adaptation), and linking and calibration. We conclude by describing potential future multidimensional applications of IRT techniques that may improve the precision with which AD is measured.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 373
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Pearson Assessments
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Statistical theories of mental test scores
[3]   Improved Statistical Power of Alzheimer Clinical Trials by Item-Response Theory: Proof of Concept by Application to the Activities of Daily Living Scale [J].
Ard, M. Colin ;
Galasko, Douglas R. ;
Edland, Steven D. .
ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2013, 27 (02) :187-191
[4]  
Balsis S., 2017, STAT MODEL DYNAMIC M
[5]   How Do Scores on the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SOB Correspond? [J].
Balsis, Steve ;
Benge, Jared F. ;
Lowe, Deborah A. ;
Geraci, Lisa ;
Doody, Rachelle S. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 29 (07) :1002-1009
[6]   Gaining precision on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive: A comparison of item response theory-based scores and total scores [J].
Balsis, Steve ;
Unger, Alexis A. ;
Benge, Jared F. ;
Geraci, Lisa ;
Doody, Rachelle S. .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2012, 8 (04) :288-294
[7]   Dementia Staging across Three Different Methods [J].
Balsis, Steve ;
Miller, Tyler M. ;
Benge, Jared F. ;
Doody, Rachelle S. .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 31 (05) :328-333
[8]   How Well Do the ADAS-cog and its Subscales Measure Cognitive Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease? [J].
Benge, Jared F. ;
Balsis, Steve ;
Geraci, Lisa ;
Massman, Paul J. ;
Doody, Rachelle S. .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2009, 28 (01) :63-69
[9]   Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease [J].
Birks, J .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (01)
[10]   Developing a Short Form of Benton's Judgment of Line Orientation Test: An Item Response Theory Approach [J].
Calamia, Matthew ;
Markon, Kristian ;
Denburg, Natalie L. ;
Tranel, Daniel .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 25 (04) :670-684