Isotopomer signatures of soil-emitted N2O under different moisture conditions -: A microcosm study with arable loess soil

被引:101
|
作者
Well, Reinhard
Kurganova, Irina
de Gerenyu, Valentin Lopes
Flessa, Heinz
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Inst Soil Sci & Forest Nutr, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Physicochem & Biol Problems Soil Sci, Pushchino 142290, Russia
来源
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY | 2006年 / 38卷 / 09期
关键词
stable isotopes; isotopomers; nitrous oxide; denitrification; nitrification; loess;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.05.003
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soils represent the major source of the atmospheric greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) and there is a need to better constrain the total global flux and the relative contribution of the microbial source processes. The aim of our study was to evaluate isotopomer analysis of N2O (intramolecular distribution of N-15) as well as conventional nitrogen and oxygen isotope ratios (i) as a tool to identify N2O production processes in soils and (ii) to constrain the isotopic fingerprint of soil-derived N2O. We conducted a microcosm study with arable loess soil fertilized with 20 mg N kg(-1) of (NO3-)-N-15-labeled or non-labeled ammonium nitrate. Soils were incubated for 16 d at varying moisture (55%, 75% and 85% water-filled pore space (WFPS)) in order to establish different levels of nitrification and denitrification. Dual isotope and isotopomer ratios of emitted N2O were determined by mass spectrometric analysis of delta O-18, average delta N-15 (delta N-15(bulk)) and N-15 site preference (SP = difference in delta N-15 between the central and peripheral N-positions of the asymmetric N2O molecule). Total rates and N2O emission of denitrification and nitrification were determined by N-15 analysis of headspace gases and soil extracts of the (NO3-)-N-15 treatment. N2O emission and denitrification increased with moisture whereas gross nitrification was almost constant. In the 55% WFPS treatment, more than half of the N2O flux was derived from nitrification, whereas denitrification was the dominant N2O source in the 75% WFPS and 85% WFPS treatments. Moisture conditions were reflected by the isotopic signatures since highly significant differences were observed for average delta N-15(bulk) SP and delta O-18. Experiment means of the 75% WFPS and 85% WFPS treatments gave negative delta N-15(bulk) (-18.0 parts per thousand and -34.8 parts per thousand, respectively) and positive SP (8.6 parts per thousand and 15.3 parts per thousand, respectively), which we explained by the fractionation during N2O production and partial reduction to N-2. In the 55% WFPS treatment, mean SP was relatively low (1.9 parts per thousand), which suggests that nitrification produced N2O with low or negative SP. The observed influence of process condition on isotopomer signatures suggests that the isotopomer approach might be suitable for identifying N2O source processes. However, more research is needed to determine the impact from process rates and microbial community structure. Isotopomer signatures were within the range reported from previous soil studies which supports the assumption that SP of soil-derived N2O is lower than SP of tropospheric N2O. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2923 / 2933
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Isotope fractionation factors controlling isotopocule signatures of soil-emitted N2O produced by denitrification processes of various rates
    Lewicka-Szczebak, Dominika
    Well, Reinhard
    Bol, Roland
    Gregory, Andrew S.
    Matthews, G. Peter
    Misselbrook, Tom
    Whalley, W. Richard
    Cardenas, Laura M.
    RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2015, 29 (03) : 269 - 282
  • [2] N2O emissions from a cultivated mineral soil under different soil drainage conditions
    Tesfai, Mehreteab
    Hauge, Atle
    Hansen, Sissel
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 65 : 128 - 138
  • [3] Dual isotope and isotopomer measurements for the understanding of N2O production and consumption during denitrification in an arable soil
    Meijide, A.
    Cardenas, L. M.
    Bol, R.
    Bergstermann, A.
    Goulding, K.
    Well, R.
    Vallejo, A.
    Scholefield, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2010, 61 (03) : 364 - 374
  • [4] Soil N2O emissions and N2O/(N2O+N2) ratio as affected by different fertilization practices and soil moisture
    Ciarlo, E.
    Conti, M.
    Bartoloni, N.
    Rubio, G.
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2008, 44 (07) : 991 - 995
  • [5] Soil N2O emissions and N2O/(N2O+N2) ratio as affected by different fertilization practices and soil moisture
    E. Ciarlo
    M. Conti
    N. Bartoloni
    G. Rubio
    Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2008, 44 : 991 - 995
  • [6] Dinitrogen and N2O emissions in arable soils:: Effect of tillage, N source and soil moisture
    Liu, Xuejun J.
    Mosier, Arvin R.
    Halvorson, Ardell D.
    Reule, Curtis A.
    Zhang, Fusuo S.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 39 (09): : 2362 - 2370
  • [7] N2O and CO2 Emissions From Arable and Grassland Soils Under Various Moisture Regimes: A Microcosm Study
    Shah, A.
    Gaebler, R.
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2016, 20 : 95 - 110
  • [8] Soil denitrification potential and its influence on N2O reduction and N2O isotopomer ratios
    Koester, Jan Reent
    Well, Reinhard
    Dittert, Klaus
    Giesemann, Anette
    Lewicka-Szczebak, Dominika
    Muehling, Karl-Hermann
    Herrmann, Antje
    Lammel, Joachim
    Senbayram, Mehmet
    RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2013, 27 (21) : 2363 - 2373
  • [9] The effect of nitrification inhibitor on N2O, NO and N2 emissions under different soil moisture levels in a permanent grassland soil
    Wu, Di
    Cardenas, Laura M.
    Calvet, Salvador
    Brueggemann, Nicolas
    Loick, Nadine
    Liu, Shurong
    Bol, Roland
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 113 : 153 - 160
  • [10] Soil N2O emissions following cover-crop residues application under two soil moisture conditions
    Pimentel, Laisa Gouveia
    Weiler, Douglas Adams
    Pedroso, Gabriel Munhoz
    Bayer, Cimelio
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2015, 178 (04) : 631 - 640