Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges

被引：312
|
作者：
Bostrom, Nick [1 ,2 ]
Sandberg, Anders [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Oxford, Future Human Inst, Fac Philosophy, Oxford OX1 1PT, England
[2] Univ Oxford, James Martin 21st Century Sch, Oxford OX1 1PT, England
来源：
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS | 2009年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词：
Cognitive enhancement; Ethics; Human enhancement; IQ; Intelligence; Policy; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; BRAIN-MACHINE INTERFACE; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; WORKING-MEMORY; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; DOUBLE-BLIND; ENRICHED ENVIRONMENT; LONGITUDINAL COHORT; HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS;
D O I：
10.1007/s11948-009-9142-5
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Cognitive enhancement takes many and diverse forms. Various methods of cognitive enhancement have implications for the near future. At the same time, these technologies raise a range of ethical issues. For example, they interact with notions of authenticity, the good life, and the role of medicine in our lives. Present and anticipated methods for cognitive enhancement also create challenges for public policy and regulation.
引用
收藏
页码：311 / 341
页数：31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neuroethics of Cognitive Enhancement
    Danielle C. Turner
    Barbara J. Sahakian
    BioSocieties, 2006, 1 (1) : 113 - 123
  • [32] Sleep for cognitive enhancement
    Diekelmann, Susanne
    FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [33] Untangling the debate: The ethics of human enhancement
    Lin P.
    Allhoff F.
    NanoEthics, 2008, 2 (3) : 251 - 264
  • [34] Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary
    Allhoff, Fritz
    Lin, Patrick
    Steinberg, Jesse
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2011, 17 (02) : 201 - 212
  • [35] Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary
    Fritz Allhoff
    Patrick Lin
    Jesse Steinberg
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2011, 17 : 201 - 212
  • [36] Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement
    Green, C. Shawn
    Bavelier, Daphne
    Kramer, Arthur F.
    Vinogradov, Sophia
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    Ball, Karlene K.
    Bingel, Ulrike
    Chein, Jason M.
    Colzato, Lorenza S.
    Edwards, Jerri D.
    Facoetti, Andrea
    Gazzaley, Adam
    Gathercole, Susan E.
    Ghisletta, Paolo
    Gori, Simone
    Granic, Isabela
    Hillman, Charles H.
    Hommel, Bernhard
    Jaeggi, Susanne M.
    Kanske, Philipp
    Karbach, Julia
    Kingstone, Alan
    Kliegel, Matthias
    Klingberg, Torkel
    Kuehn, Simone
    Levi, Dennis M.
    Mayer, Richard E.
    McLaughlin, Anne Collins
    McNamara, Danielle S.
    Morris, Martha Clare
    Nahum, Mor
    Newcombe, Nora S.
    Panizzutti, Rogerio
    Prakash, Ruchika Shaurya
    Rizzo, Albert
    Schubert, Torsten
    Seitz, Aaron R.
    Short, Sarah J.
    Singh, Ilina
    Slotta, James D.
    Strobach, Tilo
    Thomas, Michael S. C.
    Tipton, Elizabeth
    Tong, Xin
    Vlach, Haley A.
    Wetherell, Julie Loebach
    Wexler, Anna
    Witt, Claudia M.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT, 2019, 3 (01) : 2 - 29
  • [37] Arguments in favour of and against cognitive enhancement A critical survey
    Biedermann, Ferenc
    ETHIK IN DER MEDIZIN, 2010, 22 (04) : 317 - 329
  • [38] From Clinical Application to Cognitive Enhancement: The Example of Methylphenidate
    Busardo, Francesco Paolo
    Kyriakou, Chrystalla
    Cipolloni, Luigi
    Zaami, Simona
    Frati, Paola
    CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 14 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [39] Challenges to the Teaching of Professional Ethics in Accounting under an International Regulatory Framework: The Colombian Case
    Ruiz-Urquijo, Juan C.
    VISION 2025: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS THROUGH SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, 2019, : 7795 - 7807
  • [40] IoT Ethics Challenges and Legal Issues
    AboBakr, Ahmed
    Azer, Marianne A.
    2017 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS (ICCES), 2017, : 233 - 237
12345