Style, Substance, and Philosophical Methodology: A Cross-Cultural Case Study

被引:2
作者
Chung, Julianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
Chinese philosophy; comparative philosophy; cross-cultural philosophy; fictionalism; literary cognitivism; philosophical methodology; Zhuangzi; METAPHOR;
D O I
10.1017/S0012217318000033
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
One challenge involved in integrating so-called 'non-Western' philosophies into 'Western' philosophical discourse concerns the fact that non-Western philosophical texts frequently differ significantly in style and approach from Western ones, especially those in contemporary analytic philosophy. But how might one bring texts that are written, for example, in a literary, non-expository style, and which do not clearly advance philosophical positions or arguments, into constructive dialogue with those that do? Also, why might one seek to do this in the first place? This paper addresses these questions by means of a case study involving the Daoist classic, the Zhuangzi.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 250
页数:34
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, JAPANESE PHILOS ABRO
[2]  
Burri Alex, 2007, A Sense of the World: Essays on Fiction, Narrative, and Knowledge, P308
[3]  
Camp E, 2006, MIND LANG, V21, P280
[4]  
Camp E, 2009, MIDWEST STUD PHILOS, V33, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00186.x
[5]  
Camp Elisabeth L, PHILOS PERS IN PRESS
[6]   The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge [J].
Carroll, N .
JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM, 2002, 60 (01) :3-26
[7]  
Chakrabarti Arindam., 2016, Comparative Philosophy without Borders
[8]  
Chinn M., 2016, ASIAN AESTHETICS AM
[9]  
Chung J., LEARNING ARTS SKILL
[10]  
Chung J, 2017, COMP PHILOS, V8, P3