Imperfect detection impacts the performance of species distribution models

被引:214
作者
Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J. [1 ]
Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta [1 ]
Wintle, Brendan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY | 2014年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
AUC; calibration; detectability; discrimination; GLM; hierarchical occupancy modelling; logistic regression; Maxent; presence-absence; presence-background; POINT PROCESS MODELS; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; RANGE DYNAMICS; OCCUPANCY; HABITAT; ABSENCE; MAXENT; AUC; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1111/geb.12138
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
AimSpecies often remain undetected at sites where they are present. However, the impact of imperfect detection on species distribution models (SDMs) is not fully appreciated. In this paper we evaluate the influence of imperfect detection on the calibration and discrimination capacity of SDMs. We compare the performance of three types of SDMs: (1) a technique based on presence-absence data, (2) a technique based on presence-background data, and (3) a technique based on detection/non-detection data that accounts for imperfect detection. InnovationWe use simulations to evaluate the impacts of imperfect detection in SDMs. This allows us to assess model performance with respect to the true objective of the models: the estimation of species distributions. We study a range of scenarios of occupancy and detection based on ecologically plausible environmental relationships and identify the circumstances in which imperfect detection affects model calibration and discrimination. We show that imperfect detection can substantially reduce the inferential and predictive accuracy of presence-absence and presence-background methods that do not account for detectability. While calibration is always affected, the influence on discrimination depends on the relationship of detectability and environmental variables. Main conclusionsThe performance of a model should be assessed with respect to its objectives. Comparative studies that intend to assess the performance of an SDM by evaluating its ability to predict detections rather than presences fail to reveal the benefits of accounting for detectability. Disregarding imperfect detection can have severe consequences for SDM performance, and hence for the estimation of species distributions. To date, this issue has been largely ignored in the SDM literature. Simultaneously modelling occupancy and detection does not necessarily require a greater sampling effort, but rather that data are collected so that they are informative about detectability. We recommend that consideration of imperfect detection become standard practice for species distribution modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 515
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Climate and the range dynamics of species with imperfect detection
    Altwegg, Res
    Wheeler, Marius
    Erni, Birgit
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 4 (05) : 581 - 584
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical informationtheoretic approach
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1983, Generalized Linear Models
  • [5] Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Guisan, Antoine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2006, 33 (10) : 1677 - 1688
  • [6] Species distribution modelling and imperfect detection: comparing occupancy versus consensus methods
    Comte, Lise
    Grenouillet, Gael
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2013, 19 (08) : 996 - 1007
  • [7] Modeling probability of waterfowl encounters from satellite imagery of habitat in the central Canadian arctic
    Conkin, John A.
    Alisauskas, Ray T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 77 (05) : 931 - 946
  • [8] Predicting the Geographic Distribution of a Species from Presence-Only Data Subject to Detection Errors
    Dorazio, Robert M.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2012, 68 (04) : 1303 - 1312
  • [9] Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data
    Elith, J
    Graham, CH
    Anderson, RP
    Dudík, M
    Ferrier, S
    Guisan, A
    Hijmans, RJ
    Huettmann, F
    Leathwick, JR
    Lehmann, A
    Li, J
    Lohmann, LG
    Loiselle, BA
    Manion, G
    Moritz, C
    Nakamura, M
    Nakazawa, Y
    Overton, JM
    Peterson, AT
    Phillips, SJ
    Richardson, K
    Scachetti-Pereira, R
    Schapire, RE
    Soberón, J
    Williams, S
    Wisz, MS
    Zimmermann, NE
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2006, 29 (02) : 129 - 151
  • [10] A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
    Elith, Jane
    Phillips, Steven J.
    Hastie, Trevor
    Dudik, Miroslav
    Chee, Yung En
    Yates, Colin J.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2011, 17 (01) : 43 - 57