The deployment and penetration of high-speed fiber networks and services: Why are EU member states lagging behind?

被引:28
作者
Briglauer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Gugler, Klaus [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Res Inst Regulatory Econ, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Inst Quantitat Econ, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[3] Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Res Inst Regulatory Econ, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Next-generation telecommunications networks; Regulation; Investment; Penetration; Diffusion analysis; BROAD-BAND PENETRATION; INFRASTRUCTURE COMPETITION; ACCESS; INVESTMENT; LADDER; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2013.05.003
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
One of the most controversial regulatory issues in Europe (and elsewhere) is whether the emerging next-generation access (NGA) infrastructure should be subjected to cost-based access regulation or whether at least a temporary removal of ex ante obligations ("regulatory holidays") should be granted. Likewise, the role of NGA-specific state aid policies is increasingly capturing the attention of policy makers and the academic literature. In answering the questions raised above, we examine the previous and foreseeable EU regulatory framework and show that currently it does not provide sufficient incentives for NGA deployment and hence for increased penetration of NGA services. On the basis of an international comparison and by means of a diffusion analysis with recent NGA data, we argue that deregulatory and/or state-aid-driven approaches targeted at the demand (subscribers) and supply side (coverage) are more promising. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 835
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[2]  
Analysys Mason, 2010, CONTEMPORARY FTTH ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Next Generation Connectivity: A Review of Broadband Internet and Policy from Around the World
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, COMMISSION DRAFT REC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, BROOKINGS ISSUES EC
[6]  
Aron D.J., 2003, WIRE STUDIES DIFFUSI, P119
[7]  
Arrow K. J., 1962, THE RATE AND DIRECTI
[8]  
Atkinson R. D., 2008, EXPLAINING INTERNATI
[9]  
Bacache M., 2012, WORKING PAPER
[10]   Access regulation, competition, and broadband penetration: An international study [J].
Bouckaert, Jan ;
van Dijk, Theon ;
Verboven, Frank .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2010, 34 (11) :661-671