Role of chemical and visual cues of mammalian predators in nest defense in birds

被引:22
作者
Amo, Luisa [1 ]
Tomas, Gustavo [2 ]
Lopez-Garcia, Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, MNCN, Dept Ecol Evolut, C Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[2] CSIC, EEZA, Dept Ecol Func & Evolut, Carretera Sacramento S-N, E-04120 Almeria, Spain
关键词
Avian olfaction; Predation risk assessment; Chemical cues; Visual cues; Provisioning behavior; Nest defense; Predator cues; RISK; AVOIDANCE; RESPONSES; BEHAVIOR; SCENT; ODOR; TITS; RECOGNITION; URINE; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s00265-017-2281-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We explore for the first time the relative importance of chemical and visual cues of predators in nest defense and antipredator behavior in a hole-nesting songbird, the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. Birds breeding in nest boxes were exposed to chemical or visual cues of a predatory and a non-predatory mammal during the nestling stage, and their behavior both outside and inside nest boxes was recorded with video films. Our results show that birds respond equally to chemical and to visual cues of predators in a context of nest defense. Adult birds minimized predation risk by decreasing the time spent inside the nest box while feeding nestlings when they were exposed to either visual or chemical cues of a mammalian predator. They decreased the time spent in non-essential activities for nestlings' survival, such as nest sanitation activities, but they maintained provisioning rates so that the nestlings' growth was not compromised. In this way, birds minimized the risk of predation while provisioning nestlings when a predator was detected in the vicinity of their nest.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Predator odour recognition and avoidance in a songbird [J].
Amo, L. ;
Galvan, I. ;
Tomas, G. ;
Sanz, J. J. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 22 (02) :289-293
[2]  
Amo L, 2005, HERPETOL J, V15, P21
[3]   Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges [J].
Amo, L ;
López, P ;
Martín, J .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2004, 67 :647-653
[4]  
Amo L, 2015, REV CHIL HIST NAT, V88, DOI [10.1186/s40693-015-0036-4, 10.1186/S40693-015-0036-4]
[5]   Sleeping Birds Do Not Respond to Predator Odour [J].
Amo, Luisa ;
Caro, Samuel P. ;
Visser, Marcel E. .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[6]   Smelling out predators is innate in birds [J].
Amo, Luisa ;
Visser, Marcel E. ;
van Oers, Kees .
ARDEA, 2011, 99 (02) :177-184
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[8]   The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: A review of field and laboratory studies [J].
Apfelbach, R ;
Blanchard, CD ;
Blanchard, RJ ;
Hayes, RA ;
McGregor, IS .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2005, 29 (08) :1123-1144
[9]   Predator inspection behaviour in a characin fish: an interaction between chemical and visual information? [J].
Brown, GE ;
Magnavacca, G .
ETHOLOGY, 2003, 109 (09) :739-750
[10]   Threat-sensitive predator avoidance by slimy sculpins: understanding the importance of visual versus chemical information [J].
Chivers, DP ;
Mirza, RS ;
Bryer, PJ ;
Kiesecker, JM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 2001, 79 (05) :867-873