γ-H2AX responds to DNA damage induced by long-term exposure to combined low-dose-rate neutron and γ-ray radiation

被引:31
作者
Zhang, Junlin [1 ,2 ]
He, Ying [2 ]
Shen, Xianrong [2 ]
Jiang, Dingwen [2 ]
Wang, Qingrong [2 ]
Liu, Qiong [2 ]
Fang, Wen [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Food Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Naval Med Res Inst, Dept Protect Med, PLA Key Lab Biol Effect & Med Protect Warship Spe, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] China Pharmaceut Univ, Dept Biol Engn, Nanjing 211198, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Low-dose radiation; Co-60; gamma-ray; Neutron; gamma-H2AX; Ku70; Ku80; STRAND BREAK REPAIR; NORMAL HUMAN FIBROBLASTS; IONIZING-RADIATION; CELLULAR RADIOSENSITIVITY; CANCER-RISKS; CAPACITY; CELLS; RECOMBINATION; EXPRESSION; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.11.004
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Risk estimates for low-dose radiation (LDR) remain controversial. The possible involvement of DNA repair-related genes in long-term low-dose-rate neutron-gamma radiation exposure is poorly understood. In this study, 60 rats were divided into control groups and irradiated groups, which were exposed to low-dose-rate n-gamma combined radiation (LDCR) for 15, 30, or 60 days. The effects of different cumulative radiation doses on peripheral blood cell (PBC), subsets of T cells of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and DNA damage repair were investigated. Real-time PCR and immunoblot analyses were used to detect expression of DNA DSB-repair-related genes involved in the NHEJ pathway, such as Ku70 and Ku80, in PBL. The mRNA level of H2AX and the expression level of gamma-H2AX were detected by real-time PCR, immunoblot, and flow cytometry. White blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT) of all ionizing radiation (IR) groups decreased significantly, while no difference was seen between the 30 day and 60 day exposure groups. The numbers of CD3(+), CD4(+) T cells and CD4(+)/CD8(+) in the PBL of IR groups were lower than in the control group. In the 30 day and 60 day exposure groups, CD8(+) T cells decreased significantly. Real-time PCR and immunoblot results showed no significant difference in the mRNA and protein expression of Ku70 and Ku80 between the control groups and IR groups. However, the mRNA of H2AX increased significantly, and there was a positive correlation with dose. There was no difference in the protein expression of gamma-H2AX between 30 day and 60 day groups, which may help to explain the damage to PBL. In conclusion, PBL damage increased with cumulative dose, suggesting that gamma-H2AX, but neither Ku70 nor Ku80, plays an important role in PBL impairment induced by LDCR. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Low-dose radiation: Thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses [J].
Bonner, WM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (09) :4973-4975
[2]   Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Sachs, RK .
RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2006, 44 (04) :253-256
[3]   Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Doll, R ;
Goodhead, DT ;
Hall, EJ ;
Land, CE ;
Little, JB ;
Lubin, JH ;
Preston, DL ;
Preston, RJ ;
Puskin, JS ;
Ron, E ;
Sachs, RK ;
Samet, JM ;
Setlow, RB ;
Zaider, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :13761-13766
[4]   DNA double strand break repair and chromosomal translocation: Lessons from animal models [J].
Ferguson, DO ;
Alt, FW .
ONCOGENE, 2001, 20 (40) :5572-5579
[5]   Late embryonic lethality and impaired V(D)J recombination in mice lacking DNA ligase IV [J].
Frank, KM ;
Sekiguchi, JM ;
Seidl, KJ ;
Swat, W ;
Rathbun, GA ;
Cheng, HL ;
Davidson, L ;
Kangaloo, L ;
Alt, FW .
NATURE, 1998, 396 (6707) :173-177
[6]   Inducible response required for repair of low-dose radiation damage in human fibroblasts [J].
Grudzenski, Saskia ;
Raths, Antonia ;
Conrad, Sandro ;
Ruebe, Claudia E. ;
Loebrich, Markus .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (32) :14205-14210
[7]   DNA double-strand break repair from head to tail [J].
Hopfner, KP ;
Putnam, CD ;
Tainer, JA .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) :115-122
[8]   Mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair and chromosome aberration formation [J].
Iliakis, G ;
Wang, H ;
Perrault, AR ;
Boecker, W ;
Rosidi, B ;
Windhofer, F ;
Wu, W ;
Guan, J ;
Terzoudi, G ;
Pantelias, G .
CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 104 (1-4) :14-20
[9]   The γ-H2A.X:: Is it just a surrogate marker of double-strand breaks or much more? [J].
Ismail, Ismail Hassan ;
Hendzel, Michael J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2008, 49 (01) :73-82
[10]   Ku70/80 gene expression and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) activity do not correlate with double-strand break (dsb) repair capacity and cellular radiosensitivity in normal human fibroblasts [J].
Kasten, U ;
Plottner, N ;
Johansen, J ;
Overgaard, J ;
Dikomey, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (7-8) :1037-1041