Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side

被引:1
作者
Iqbal, Nadeem [1 ]
Iqbal, Sajid [2 ]
Zareen, Nasir [3 ]
Blair, Keron Akintola Ayodele [4 ]
机构
[1] Shifa Int Hosp, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Pakistan Navy PNS Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Karachi, Pakistan
[3] SKBZ CMH Rawlakot, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
[4] Amer Int Sch Med, Georgetown, Guyana
关键词
PCNL; Stone Free Rates; Shock Wave Lithotripsy; Renal Stones; Complications; OPEN RENAL SURGERY; PERFORMANCE; COMPLICATIONS; PCNL;
D O I
10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To appraise the effects of previous history of ineffectual extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment on the execution and end result of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods: The study was performed from January 2012 till November 2019 at the urology department at our hospital, a tertiary healthcare center. In total, four hundred and twenty two patients were enrolled in the study. We arranged the study participants into two groups. Group-I comprised of 66 subjects who had undergone failed SWL 12 months prior to PCNL procedure, while Group-II included patients who had no history of previous SWL. Information related to study variables was registered in designated proformas and then processed in SPSS version 16 for the statistical computations. Results: On the whole, the mean age of patients was 45.25 +/- 14.38 years. While the mean calculus size was 494.80 +/- 128.83 mm(2). The complexity of stones formulated on the basis of Guy's stone score was identical among the two groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class categories were almost similar among the two groups. Stone free rates of 80.30% and 81.74% (p value=0.73) were observed in Group-I and II respectively. Time to create PCNL tract and mean drop in hemoglobin were noted to be significantly higher in Group-I. Complication rates and grades were not being dissimilar among the two groups. Conclusion: Patients having prior history of unsuccessful SWL history before undertaking the PCNL procedure manifested similar stone free rates and complications rates as those observed in SWL naive cases of PCNL.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 837
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] REAL LIFE RETROGRADE FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY VERSUS EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IN PYELOCALICEAL STONES UNDER 20 MM
    Radu, V. D.
    Costache, R. C.
    Onofrei, P.
    Novac, B.
    Bandac, Carina-Alexandra
    Arseni, D.
    Vaida, M.
    Ristescu, C.
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2024, 128 (03): : 525 - 534
  • [22] Impact of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric patients: Complications and long-term follow-up
    Gschwend, JE
    Haag, U
    Hollmer, S
    Kleinschmidt, K
    Hautmann, RE
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1996, 56 (04) : 241 - 245
  • [23] Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    ElSheemy, Mohammed S.
    Daw, Kareem
    Habib, Enmar
    Aboulela, Waseem
    Fathy, Hesham
    Shouman, Ahmed M.
    El Ghoneimy, Mohamed
    Shoukry, Ahmed I.
    Morsi, Hany A.
    Badawy, Hesham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 564 - 570
  • [24] What is the best approach for pediatric kidney stones of moderate-sized between shock wave lithotripsy, ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery?
    Unal, Umut
    Deniz, Mehmet Eflatun
    Ortoglu, Ferhat
    Vuruskan, Ediz
    Anil, Hakan
    Altunkol, Adem
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 38 (11) : 1643 - 1648
  • [25] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Adult Patients: Factors Affecting the Success of the Procedure in Kidney Stones
    Akman, Tolga
    Berberoglu, Yalcin
    Seyrek, Mahir
    Binbay, Murat
    Sekerel, Levent Deniz
    Ozkuvanci, Unsal
    Muslumanoglu, Ahmet Yaser
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2010, 48 (03): : 106 - 109
  • [26] Shock-wave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm renal stones: A randomised pilot study
    McCahy, Philip J.
    Hong, Matthew
    Paul, Eldho
    Berman, Ivor
    Shahbaz, Shekib
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2020, 13 (06) : 413 - 418
  • [27] Effect of Escalating Versus Fixed Voltage Treatment on Stone Comminution and Renal Injury During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Lambert, Erica H.
    Walsh, Rhonda
    Moreno, Melissa W.
    Gupta, Mantu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) : 580 - 584
  • [28] What is the best approach for pediatric kidney stones of moderate-sized between shock wave lithotripsy, ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery?
    Umut Unal
    Mehmet Eflatun Deniz
    Ferhat Ortoglu
    Ediz Vuruskan
    Hakan Anil
    Adem Altunkol
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2022, 38 : 1643 - 1648
  • [29] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1–2 cm: a meta-analysis
    Changjian Zheng
    Hongmei Yang
    Jun Luo
    Bo Xiong
    Hongzhi Wang
    Qing Jiang
    Urolithiasis, 2015, 43 : 549 - 556
  • [30] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Clinical Effectiveness of Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower-pole Renal Stones
    Donaldson, James F.
    Lardas, Michael
    Scrimgeour, Duncan
    Stewart, Fiona
    MacLennan, Steven
    Lam, Thomas B. L.
    McClinton, Samuel
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 612 - 616