Description Logic Programs: A Paraconsistent Relational Model Approach

被引:0
作者
Jayakumar, Badrinath [1 ]
Sunderraman, Rajshekhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
来源
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, MICAI 2015, PT I | 2015年 / 9413卷
关键词
Description logic; Logic programs; Fixed-point semantics; Paraconsistent relational model; OWL-DL; RULES; ONTOLOGIES; SEMANTICS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-27060-9_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A description logic program (dl-program) consists of a description logic knowledge base (a terminological box and an assertion box) and a set of rules for a logic program. For such description logic programs, instead of providing the fixed-point semantics for dl-programs by the immediate consequence operator, we propose an algorithm based on the paraconsistent relational model that mimics the immediate consequence operator of dl-programs. We also introduce a dl-paraconsistent relation (dl-relation), which is essential for sending information between description logic and logic programs represented in terms of equations containing paraconsistent relations. The first step in our algorithm is to convert rules, which may contain dl-atoms that enable the flow of information between description logic and logic programs, into paraconsistent relation equations that contain paraconsistent relational algebraic operators. The second step is to determine iteratively the fixed-point semantics for dl-programs using these equations. We will also prove the correctness of both steps of the algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 157
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   DESCRIPTION PLAUSIBLE LOGIC PROGRAMS FOR STREAM REASONING [J].
Letia, Ioan Alfred ;
Groza, Adrian .
ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2012, :560-566
[12]   Combining Paraconsistent Logic with Argumentation [J].
Grooters, Diana ;
Prakken, Henry .
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2014, 266 :301-312
[13]   Tightly integrated probabilistic description logic programs for representing ontology mappings [J].
Lukasiewicz, Thomas ;
Predoiu, Livia ;
Stuckenschmidt, Heiner .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 63 (3-4) :385-425
[14]   From description-logic programs to multi-context systems [J].
Cruz-Filipe, Luis ;
Gaspar, Graca ;
Nunes, Isabel .
JOURNAL OF LOGICAL AND ALGEBRAIC METHODS IN PROGRAMMING, 2017, 88 :26-44
[15]   Tightly integrated probabilistic description logic programs for representing ontology mappings [J].
Thomas Lukasiewicz ;
Livia Predoiu ;
Heiner Stuckenschmidt .
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 63 :385-425
[16]   Conjunction in Paraconsistent Weak Kleene Logic [J].
Ciuni, Roberto .
LOGICA YEARBOOK 2014, 2015, :61-76
[17]   Translating OWL and semantic web rules into prolog: Moving toward description logic programs [J].
Samuel, Ken ;
Obrst, Leo ;
Stoutenberg, Suzette ;
Fox, Karen ;
Franklin, Paul ;
Johnson, Adrian ;
Laskey, Ken ;
Nichols, Deborah ;
Lopez, Steve ;
Peterson, Jason .
THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 2008, 8 :301-322
[18]   Hybridization of Description Logics and Logic Programming [J].
Sheela, Arun Raveendran Nair .
SEMANTIC WEB: ESWC 2024 SATELLITE EVENTS, PT II, 2025, 15345 :135-145
[19]   AN EPISTEMIC INTERPRETATION OF PARACONSISTENT WEAK KLEENE LOGIC [J].
Szmuc, Damian E. .
LOGIC AND LOGICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 28 (02) :277-330
[20]   Model Checking Using Description Logic [J].
Ben-David, Shoham ;
Trefler, Richard ;
Weddell, Grant .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2010, 20 (01) :111-131