INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES

被引:3
作者
de Alencar Neto, Jonatas Brito [1 ]
Duarte de Souza, Clodoaldo Jose [1 ]
Reis Coelho, Pedro Rafael [1 ]
de Freitas Junior, Pedro Gomes [1 ]
Gadelha Lopes, Marcio Bezerra [2 ]
Maia Pinto, Francisco Jose [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dr Jose Frota, Orthoped & Traumatol Serv, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[2] Hosp Geral Fortaleza, Orthoped & Traumatol Serv, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Ceara, Sch Med, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
来源
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA | 2020年 / 28卷 / 05期
关键词
Tibial Fractures; Classification; Correlation Analyses;
D O I
10.1590/1413-785220202805228092
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To verify inter- and intra-observer agreement of three classification systems for tibial plateau fractures - Schatzker, AO/ASIF, and Luo's - among orthopedic surgery residents. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 29 observers. Radiographic and tomographic imaging of the knee of 15 patients presenting with fractures were evaluated. After six weeks, the test was reapplied. The level of agreement was calculated by the Kappa index. Results: In test 1, inter-observer agreement of all residents, according to the Kappa index, for Schatzker classification was 0.226, for AO 0.431, and Luo's 0.319. In test 2, values were 0.316, 0.333, and 0.347, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding intra-observer analysis, the mean Kappa indexes of 1st-year residents were: Schatzker, 0.20; AO, 0.32; and Luo's, 0.3. For 2nd-year residents, means were: 0.51, 0.58, and 0.38, respectively. As for 3rd-year, results were 0.42, 0.42, and 0.41, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: AO/ASIF showed a better reproducibility than other classifications, with substantial interand intra-observer agreement. We also found a stronger agreement among 2nd- and 3rd-year residents.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 220
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Injury severity assessment in tibial plateau fractures
    Dirschl, DR
    Dawson, PA
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (423) : 85 - 92
  • [2] ELABJER E, 2017, INJURY S5, V48, pS6
  • [3] Population-Based Epidemiology of Tibial Plateau Fractures
    Elsoe, Rasmus
    Larsen, Peter
    Nielsen, Nina Pil Hostrup
    Swenne, Johanna
    Rasmussen, Sten
    Ostgaard, Svend Erik
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (09) : E780 - E786
  • [5] Three-Column Fixation for Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures
    Luo, Cong-Feng
    Sun, Hui
    Zhang, Bo
    Zeng, Bing-Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 (11) : 683 - 692
  • [6] Mandarine M., 2004, REV, V2, P11
  • [7] Radiographic fracture assessments: Which ones can we reliably make?
    Martin, J
    Marsh, JL
    Nepola, JV
    Dirschl, DR
    Hurwitz, S
    DeCoster, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (06) : 379 - 385
  • [8] Tibial Plateau Fracture Characteristics: Computed Tomography Mapping of Lateral, Medial, and Bicondylar Fractures
    Molenaars, Rik J.
    Mellema, Jos J.
    Doornberg, Job N.
    Kloen, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (18) : 1512 - 1520
  • [9] A review of the management of tibial plateau fractures
    Mthethwa J.
    Chikate A.
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2018, 102 (2) : 119 - 127
  • [10] EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY ON TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES AT A LEVEL I TRAUMA CENTER
    Pires e Albuquerque, Rodrigo
    Hara, Rafael
    Prado, Juliano
    Schiavo, Leonardo
    Giordano, Vincenzo
    do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro
    [J]. ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 21 (02): : 109 - 115