Paranoid personality and frontline employee's proactive work behaviours: a moderated mediation model of empathetic leadership and perceived psychological safety

被引:22
作者
Bani-Melhem, Shaker [1 ]
Mohd. Shamsudin, Faridahwati [2 ]
Mazen Abukhait, Rawan [3 ]
Quratulain, Samina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Coll Business Adm, Management, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Al Akhawayn Univ, Sch Business Adm, Management, Ifrane, Morocco
[3] Ajman Univ, Coll Business Adm, Management, Ajman, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Paranoia; Proactive behaviour; Psychological safety; Empathetic leadership; Hospitality and service industry; UAE; SERVICE RECOVERY PERFORMANCE; DARK TRIAD; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; CUSTOMER SERVICE; VOICE; NARCISSISM; ENGAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; SELF;
D O I
10.1108/JSTP-05-2020-0104
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This study expands on research related to the dark side of personality traits by examining how individual dark personality affects proactive work behaviours. Specifically, the authors consider paranoia as a dark personality trait and propose that it negatively relates to perceived psychological safety and indirectly affects frontline employees' (FLEs) willingness to report customer complaints as well as their extra-role customer service. The authors also posit that empathetic leadership is a focal, contextual factor that mitigates the impact of paranoia on perceived psychological safety and, consequently, the willingness to report customer complaints and engage in extra-role customer service behaviour. Design/methodology/approach The model was tested on a sample of 252 FLEs using process macro (Hayes, 2017) and AMOS. Data were collected from FLEs working in different hospitality organisations using a time-lagged design; supervisor-rated employee extra-role customer service was also measured. Findings The authors found that FLEs with a paranoid personality trait had a lesser sense of psychological safety at work, which reduced their willingness to engage in proactive work behaviours. However, this negative effect was mitigated by the presence of an empathetic leader. Originality/value The results are important because research has yet to determine which actions managers should take to counter the negative effects of dark personalities in the workplace.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 135
页数:23
相关论文
共 111 条
[21]   ABUSIVE SUPERVISION THROUGH THE LENS OF EMPLOYEE STATE PARANOIA [J].
Chan, Meowlan Evelyn ;
McAllister, Daniel J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 39 (01) :44-66
[22]   The role of prosocial and proactive personality in customer citizenship behaviors [J].
Choi, Laee ;
Hwang, Jiyoung .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING, 2019, 36 (02) :288-305
[23]   WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE [J].
Christian, Michael S. ;
Garza, Adela S. ;
Slaughter, Jerel E. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (01) :89-136
[24]   Proactive behavior in organizations [J].
Crant, JM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (03) :435-462
[25]   Financial Strain and Regional Unemployment as Barriers to Job Search Self-Efficacy: A Test of Social Cognitive Career Theory [J].
Dahling, Jason J. ;
Melloy, Robert ;
Thompson, Mindi N. .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 60 (02) :210-218
[26]   THE BRIEF SYMPTOM INVENTORY - AN INTRODUCTORY REPORT [J].
DEROGATIS, LR ;
MELISARATOS, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (03) :595-605
[27]   Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams [J].
Edmondson, A .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1999, 44 (02) :350-383
[28]  
Edmondson A. C., 2004, Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, P239, DOI DOI 10.2307/2666999
[29]   Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct [J].
Edmondson, Amy C. ;
Lei, Zhike .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 1, 2014, 1 :23-43
[30]   Supervisor Prosocial Motivation, Employee Thriving, and Helping Behavior: A Trickle-Down Model of Psychological Safety [J].
Frazier, M. Lance ;
Tupper, Christina .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 43 (04) :561-593