Increase in Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer for Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Photon and Proton Therapy

被引:17
|
作者
Jakobi, Annika [1 ]
Luehr, Armin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stuetzer, Kristin [1 ]
Bandurska-Luque, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Loeck, Steffen [1 ]
Krause, Mechthild [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Baumann, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Perrin, Rosalind [1 ]
Richter, Christian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, OncoRay Natl Ctr Radiat Res Oncol,Fac Med, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Dresden, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[5] Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Inst Radiooncol, Dresden, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 5卷
关键词
photon radiotherapy; proton radiotherapy; tumor control probability; normal tissue complication probability; head-and-neck cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CHEMO-IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; HYPOXIA; BOOST; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; DYSPHAGIA; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2015.00256
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Presently used radiochemotherapy regimens result in moderate local control rates for patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Dose escalation (DE) may be an option to improve patient outcome, but may also increase the risk of toxicities in healthy tissue. The presented treatment planning study evaluated the feasibility of two DE levels for advanced HNSCC patients, planned with either intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMXT) or proton therapy (IMPT). Materials and methods: For 45 HNSCC patients, IMXT and IMPT treatment plans were created including DE via a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in the high risk volume, while maintaining standard fractionation with 2 Gy per fraction in the remaining target volume. Two DE levels for the SIB were compared: 2.3 and 2.6 Gy. Treatment plan evaluation included assessment of tumor control probabilities (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). Results: An increase of approximately 10% in TCP was estimated between the DE levels. A pronounced high-dose rim surrounding the SIB volume was identified in IMXT treatment. Compared to IMPT, this extra dose slightly increased the TCP values and to a larger extent the NTCP values. For both modalities, the higher DE level led only to a small increase in NTCP values (mean differences <2%) in all models, except for the risk of aspiration, which increased on average by 8 and 6% with IMXT and IMPT, respectively, but showed a considerable patient dependence. Conclusion: Both DE levels appear applicable to patients with IMXT and IMPT since all calculated NTCP values, except for one, increased only little for the higher DE level. The estimated TCP increase is of relevant magnitude. The higher DE schedule needs to be investigated carefully in the setting of a prospective clinical trial, especially regarding toxicities caused by high local doses that lack a sound dose response description, e.g., ulcers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance of Radiation Oncologist Experience Among Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Boero, Isabel J.
    Paravati, Anthony J.
    Xu, Beibei
    Cohen, Ezra E. W.
    Mell, Loren K.
    Quynh-Thu Le
    Murphy, James D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07) : 684 - +
  • [32] Correlating planned radiation dose to the cochlea with primary site and tumor stage in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Zhang, Jeanette
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    Truong, Minh Tam
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [33] HYPOTHYROIDISM AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY WITH CONCURRENT TAXANE-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Diaz, Roberto
    Jaboin, Jerry J.
    Morales-Paliza, Manuel
    Koehler, Elizabeth
    Phillips, John G.
    Stinson, Scott
    Gilbert, Jill
    Chung, Christine H.
    Murphy, Barbara A.
    Yarbrough, Wendell G.
    Murphy, Patrick B.
    Shyr, Yu
    Cmelak, Anthony J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (02): : 468 - 476
  • [34] PHASE II TRIAL OF HYPERFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY AND CONCURRENT WEEKLY CISPLATIN FOR STAGE III AND IVa HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Maguire, Patrick D.
    Papagikos, Michael
    Hamann, Sue
    Neal, Charles
    Meyerson, Martin
    Hayes, Neil
    Ungaro, Peter
    Kotz, Kenneth
    Couch, Marion
    Pollock, Hoke
    Tepper, Joel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (04): : 1081 - 1088
  • [35] Deep learning-based statistical robustness evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer
    Liang, Danfu
    Vazquez, Ivan
    Gronberg, Mary P.
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Frank, Steven J.
    Court, Laurence E.
    Martel, Mary K.
    Yang, Ming
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (19)
  • [36] Comparison between hypo-fractionated dose-escalated volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional concurrent chemo-radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a pilot study
    Saad, Ehab
    Radwan, Riham Hani
    Hadi, Eman Abdel
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [37] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Holt, Andrea
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    Arends, Mark P.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Schuring, Danny
    Kunze-Busch, Martina C.
    Louwe, Rob J. W.
    van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, Corine
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [38] Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study
    Andrea Holt
    Dirk Van Gestel
    Mark P Arends
    Erik W Korevaar
    Danny Schuring
    Martina C Kunze-Busch
    Rob JW Louwe
    Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [39] Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization
    Michiels, Steven
    Barragan, Ana Maria
    Souris, Kevin
    Poels, Kenneth
    Crijns, Wouter
    Lee, John A.
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Haustermans, Karin
    Depuydt, Tom
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (01) : 161 - 166
  • [40] Cone beam CT-based adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy assessment using automated planning for head-and-neck cancer
    Xu, Yihang
    Jin, William
    Butkus, Michael
    De Ornelas, Mariluz
    Cyriac, Jonathan
    Studenski, Matthew T.
    Padgett, Kyle
    Simpson, Garrett
    Samuels, Stuart
    Samuels, Michael
    Dogan, Nesrin
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)