Increase in Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer for Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Photon and Proton Therapy

被引:17
|
作者
Jakobi, Annika [1 ]
Luehr, Armin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stuetzer, Kristin [1 ]
Bandurska-Luque, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Loeck, Steffen [1 ]
Krause, Mechthild [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Baumann, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Perrin, Rosalind [1 ]
Richter, Christian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, OncoRay Natl Ctr Radiat Res Oncol,Fac Med, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Dresden, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[5] Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Inst Radiooncol, Dresden, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 5卷
关键词
photon radiotherapy; proton radiotherapy; tumor control probability; normal tissue complication probability; head-and-neck cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CHEMO-IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; HYPOXIA; BOOST; RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY; DYSPHAGIA; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2015.00256
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Presently used radiochemotherapy regimens result in moderate local control rates for patients with advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Dose escalation (DE) may be an option to improve patient outcome, but may also increase the risk of toxicities in healthy tissue. The presented treatment planning study evaluated the feasibility of two DE levels for advanced HNSCC patients, planned with either intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMXT) or proton therapy (IMPT). Materials and methods: For 45 HNSCC patients, IMXT and IMPT treatment plans were created including DE via a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in the high risk volume, while maintaining standard fractionation with 2 Gy per fraction in the remaining target volume. Two DE levels for the SIB were compared: 2.3 and 2.6 Gy. Treatment plan evaluation included assessment of tumor control probabilities (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). Results: An increase of approximately 10% in TCP was estimated between the DE levels. A pronounced high-dose rim surrounding the SIB volume was identified in IMXT treatment. Compared to IMPT, this extra dose slightly increased the TCP values and to a larger extent the NTCP values. For both modalities, the higher DE level led only to a small increase in NTCP values (mean differences <2%) in all models, except for the risk of aspiration, which increased on average by 8 and 6% with IMXT and IMPT, respectively, but showed a considerable patient dependence. Conclusion: Both DE levels appear applicable to patients with IMXT and IMPT since all calculated NTCP values, except for one, increased only little for the higher DE level. The estimated TCP increase is of relevant magnitude. The higher DE schedule needs to be investigated carefully in the setting of a prospective clinical trial, especially regarding toxicities caused by high local doses that lack a sound dose response description, e.g., ulcers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image-guided dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: treating to doses beyond 78 Gy
    Eade, Thomas N.
    Guo, Linxin
    Forde, Elizabeth
    Vaux, Ken
    Vass, Justin
    Hunt, Peter
    Kneebone, Andrew
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (11) : 1655 - 1660
  • [22] CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE TUMOR VOLUME REDUCTION RATE IN HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER DURING DEFINITIVE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR ORGAN PRESERVATION
    Yang, Shih-Neng
    Liao, Chih-Ying
    Chen, Shang-Wen
    Liang, Ji-An
    Tsai, Ming-Hsui
    Hua, Chun-Hung
    Lin, Fang-Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (04): : 1096 - 1103
  • [23] Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head
    Vijay P. Raturi
    Hidehiro Hojo
    Kenji Hotta
    Hiromi Baba
    Ryo Takahashi
    Toshiya Rachi
    Naoki Nakamura
    Sadamoto Zenda
    Atsushi Motegi
    Hidenobu Tachibana
    Takaki Ariji
    Kana Motegi
    Masaki Nakamura
    Masayuki Okumura
    Yasuhiro Hirano
    Tetsuo Akimoto
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [24] Patterns of Care and Outcomes Associated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Older Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Yu, James B.
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Sharma, Richa
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Decker, Roy H.
    Smith, Benjamin D.
    Desai, Rani A.
    Cramer, Laura D.
    Gross, Cary P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : E101 - E107
  • [25] Skin dose for head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)
    Fu, Hsiao-Ju
    Li, Chi-Wei
    Tsai, Wei-Ta
    Chang, Chih-Chia
    Tsang, Yuk-Wah
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 435 - 441
  • [26] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer:: Prescribed dose, clinical challenges and results
    Martin, Etienne
    Deville, Coralie
    Bonnetain, Franck
    Bosset, Mathieu
    Crehange, Gilles
    Truc, Gilles
    Naudy, Suzanne
    Maingon, Philippe
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 85 (03) : 392 - 398
  • [27] The effect of intravenous contrast on intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose calculations for head and neck cancer
    Liauw, SL
    Amdur, RJ
    Mendenhall, WM
    Palta, J
    Kim, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (05): : 456 - 459
  • [28] Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head
    Raturi, Vijay P.
    Hojo, Hidehiro
    Hotta, Kenji
    Baba, Hiromi
    Takahashi, Ryo
    Rachi, Toshiya
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Zenda, Sadamoto
    Motegi, Atsushi
    Tachibana, Hidenobu
    Ariji, Takaki
    Motegi, Kana
    Nakamura, Masaki
    Okumura, Masayuki
    Hirano, Yasuhiro
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [29] Head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy: Normal tissues dose constraints. Pharyngeal constrictor muscles and larynx
    Graff, P.
    Woisard, V.
    Racadot, S.
    Thariat, J.
    Pointreau, Y.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2016, 20 (6-7): : 452 - 458
  • [30] VOLUMETRIC INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY VS. CONVENTIONAL IMRT IN HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER: A COMPARATIVE PLANNING AND DOSIMETRIC STUDY
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    Cuijpers, Johan P.
    Hoffmans, Daan
    Bieker, Michael
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Senan, Suresh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (01): : 252 - 259