Effect of Faculty Training on Improving the Consistency of Student Assessment and Debriefing in Clinical Simulation

被引:22
作者
Cockerham, Mary Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] St Francis Med Ctr, Trenton, NJ 08629 USA
关键词
debriefing; faculty training; Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML); Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI); simulation evaluation; assessment instrument; Clinical Judgment Model; FRAMEWORK; NURSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecns.2014.10.011
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Simulation is a teaching strategy that is supported in the nursing literature. The simulation experience can be segmented into distinct areas of focus: the development of the evidence-based scenario, the method used to assess the students' performance, the technique used to debrief the participants, and the overall perception of enhanced clinical judgment skills of the students. The challenge faculty encounter when using simulation is a lack of knowledge in assessing student performance and debriefing methodologies. The purpose of this article is to describe one school's journey in improving the student learning experience in simulation. The adoption of an evidence-based approach to teach faculty assessment techniques and debriefing strategies after simulation are examined. The use of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument and the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning methodology are studied. The aim in providing faculty with additional training was to promote a more thoughtful approach to simulation as a teaching strategy. (C) 2015 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Assessing New Graduate Nurse Performance [J].
Berkow, Steven ;
Virkstis, Katherine ;
Stewart, Jennifer ;
Conway, Lindsay .
NURSE EDUCATOR, 2009, 34 (01) :17-22
[2]   Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard VI: The Debriefing Process [J].
Decker, Sharon ;
Fey, Mary ;
Sideras, Stephanie ;
Caballero, Sandra ;
Rockstraw, Leland ;
Boese, Teri ;
Franklin, Ashley E. ;
Gloe, Donna ;
Lioce, Lori ;
Sando, Carol R. ;
Meakim, Colleen ;
Borum, Jimmie C. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2013, 9 (06) :S26-S29
[3]  
Dillard N, 2009, NURS EDUC PERSPECT, V30, P98
[4]  
Dreifuerst KT, 2009, NURS EDUC PERSPECT, V30, P108
[5]   Using Debriefing for Meaningful Learning to Foster Development of Clinical Reasoning in Simulation [J].
Dreifuerst, Kristina Thomas .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (06) :326-333
[6]   Learning Through Debriefing: Students' Perspectives [J].
Fey, Mary K. ;
Scrandis, Debra ;
Daniels, Amy ;
Haut, Catherine .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2014, 10 (05) :E249-E256
[7]   Sim TRACT (TM): A Reflective Conceptual Framework for Simulation Debriefing [J].
Gum, Lyn ;
Greenhill, Jennene ;
Dix, Kerry .
JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2011, 9 (01) :21-41
[8]   Use of High-Fidelity Simulation for Staff Education/Development A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Hallenbeck, Virginia J. .
JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 28 (06) :260-269
[9]   Reliability and Validity Testing of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument for Use in the NCSBN National Simulation Study [J].
Hayden, Jennifer ;
Keegan, Mary ;
Kardong-Edgren, Suzan ;
Smiley, Richard A. .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 35 (04) :244-252
[10]  
Jeffries P., 2006, SUMMARY REPORT DESIG, P1