The effectiveness of community participation in planning and urban development

被引:9
作者
van Empel, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Christchurch Polytech Inst Technol, Christchurch, New Zealand
来源
SUSTAINABLE CITY V: URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY | 2009年 / 117卷
关键词
community participation; collaborative planning; urban development; public consultation; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; DEMOCRACY; CHOICES;
D O I
10.2495/SC080521
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Contemporary planning theories acknowledge the value of community participation in the development processes of our built environment, suggesting that community involvement has the potential to achieve a more sustainable outcome. Research in this field indicates that citizen participation can generate trust, credibility and commitment regarding the implementation of policies. This paper investigates tools to measure the effectiveness of public participation and their influence on urban development processes. Based on a literature review, a framework of indicators Was developed, which has been used to analyse the community participation process in the development of the 'Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy', a collaborative initiative to develop a growth strategy for the Christchurch region in New Zealand. Results from this case study suggest that there is a relationship between the various indicators and the main findings can be summarized as follows: (i) Most sectors of the community appear to have an interest in their built environment and urban planning processes, provided that their involvement is encouraged by stimulating information and expertise is provided to support their contributions. (ii) Although no conclusions on the motivation of the various participants in the process were reached, the professionals involved appear to have a strong interest in networking and the sharing of expertise. (iii) A commonality in the views of the public was observed, with a focus on the 'big picture' rather than self-interests. (iv) Collaborative planning was experienced as an effective technique for consensus building between professionals. (v) The quality of resources and allocation of time appear to be influential in a community participation process. (vi) Indications were given that process and product outcomes should not be evaluated separately.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 556
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[2]   Mapping public participation in policy choices [J].
Bishop, P ;
Davis, G .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 61 (01) :14-29
[3]   Mandating citizen participation in plan making - Six strategic planning choices [J].
Brody, SD ;
Godschalk, DR ;
Burby, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2003, 69 (03) :245-264
[4]   Making plans that matter - Citizen involvement and government action [J].
Burby, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2003, 69 (01) :33-49
[5]  
*GREAT CHRISTCH UR, 2006, COMM CHART
[6]  
*GREAT CHRISTCH UR, 2005, SO MAN OPT WHICH WIL
[7]   Consensus building and complex adaptive systems -: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning [J].
Innes, JE ;
Booher, DE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1999, 65 (04) :412-423
[8]   Theory in practice: Applying participatory democracy theory to public land planning [J].
Moote, MA ;
McClaran, MP ;
Chickering, DK .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 21 (06) :877-889
[9]  
Palerm J., 2000, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V43, P581, DOI DOI 10.1080/713676582
[10]   New fashions in public participation: Towards greater democracy? [J].
Pratchett, L .
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 1999, 52 (04) :616-633