The Big Five and enduring marriages

被引:196
作者
Donnellan, MB
Conger, RD
Bryant, CM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
关键词
big five; personality; marriage; marital interaction; close relationships;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2004.01.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present investigation tested the relations between the Big Five dimensions of personality and the marital relationships of over 400 couples using both observational and questionnaire data. Four major findings emerged from these analyses. First, self-reports of neuroticism were positively correlated with negative interactions and negatively correlated with global evaluations of the marriage. Second, self-reports of agreeableness were negatively correlated with negative interactions and generally positively correlated with global evaluations of the marriage. Third, self-reports of openness were negatively correlated with observer reports of negative interactions. Fourth, self-reports of openness by wives were positively correlated with global reports of sexual satisfaction. These findings suggest that agreeableness and openness deserve increased attention as significant correlates of close relationships. Discussion emphasizes the importance of intrapersonal factors for understanding marital relationships. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 504
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality [J].
Feher, Anita ;
Vernon, Philip A. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 169
[42]   Five Big, Big Five Issues: Rationale, Content, Structure, Status, and Crosscultural Assessment [J].
De Raad, Boele .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1998, 3 (02) :113-124
[43]   The Big Five personality traits, Big Two metatraits and social media: A meta-analysis [J].
Liu, Dong ;
Campbell, W. Keith .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2017, 70 :229-240
[44]   Are small measures big problems? A meta-analytic investigation of brief measures of the Big Five [J].
Ellen, B. Parker, III ;
Mackey, Jeremy D. ;
McAllister, Charn P. ;
Mercer, Ian S. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 151 :579-592
[45]   Cybernetic Big Five Theory [J].
DeYoung, Colin G. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2015, 56 :33-58
[46]   The role of the Big Five in appraisals [J].
Tong, Eddie M. W. ;
Bishop, George D. ;
Enkelmann, Hwee Chong ;
Why, Yong Peng ;
Diong, Siew Maan ;
Ang, Jansen ;
Khader, Majeed .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 41 (03) :513-523
[47]   Enactivist Big Five Theory [J].
Garri Hovhannisyan ;
John Vervaeke .
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2022, 21 :341-375
[48]   A Comparison of the Validity of Very Brief Measures of the Big Five/Five-Factor Model of Personality [J].
Sleep, Chelsea E. ;
Lynam, Donald R. ;
Miller, Joshua D. .
ASSESSMENT, 2021, 28 (03) :739-758
[49]   Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors? [J].
Courtois, R. ;
Petot, J. -M. ;
Lignier, B. ;
Lecocq, G. ;
Plaisant, O. .
ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2018, 44 (03) :208-214
[50]   The Big Five and Collaborative Problem Solving: A Narrative Systematic Review [J].
Marjanovic, Zorana Jolic ;
Krstic, Ksenija ;
Rajic, Milana ;
Ilic, Ivana Stepanovic ;
Videnovic, Marina ;
Dimitrijevic, Ana Altaras .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2024, 38 (03) :457-475