Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis

被引:38
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Cobb, William. S. [1 ]
Kercher, Kent W. [1 ]
Heniford, B. Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Carolinas Laparoscop & Adv Surg Program, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
关键词
laparoscopy; colostomy reversal; comparative trial; colorectal surgery; Hartmann's procedure;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Open colostomy reversal carries significant rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia which often limit its acceptance. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach to the restoration of intestinal continuity may result in lower perioperative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic colostomy reversals performed at a single institution were identified and compared to 22 randomly selected open colostomy closures performed during the same time period. Patients were compared based on demographics, previous indications for colostomy procedures, and perioperative outcomes. A total of 152 patients underwent reversal of left-sided colostomies during the study period. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 of 22 cases;, there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to inability to adequately mobilize the rectal stump. The laparoscopic and open groups were 2 comparable based on mean age (54 years versus 49 years; P = 0.23), BMI (26 kg/m(2) versus 27 kg/m(2); P = 0.66), gender (9% males versus 13% males; P = 0.23), ASA Class (2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.07), and history of previous intra-abdominal sepsis (17 versus 16 cases). Operative times were similar (158 versus 189 minutes; P = 0.16), and estimated blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113 versus 270 ml; P = 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred in the laparoscopic group and two enterotomies occurred in the open group. The laparoscopic group had earlier passage of flatus (3.5 versus 5.0 days, P = 0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 versus 7.3 days; P = 0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) laparoscopic and 13 (59%) open cases (P = 0.01). There was no mortality in this series. The laparoscopic approach can be safely used in the restoration of intestinal continuity. It results in a decreased perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, and it offers distinct advantages over the open approach to colostomy reversal.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 900
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparative study at a single institution
    Rassweiler, J
    Seemann, O
    Schulze, M
    Teber, D
    Hatzinger, M
    Frede, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (05) : 1689 - 1693
  • [42] Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection
    Andrea J. Rowe
    Adam T. Meneghetti
    P. Andrew Schumacher
    Andrzej K. Buczkowski
    Charles H. Scudamore
    O. Neely M. Panton
    Stephen W. Chung
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 1198 - 1203
  • [43] A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma
    Yoo, Daegwang
    Song, Ki Byung
    Lee, Jong Woo
    Hwang, Kyungyeon
    Hong, Sarang
    Shin, Dakyum
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Lee, Woohyung
    Kwon, Jaewoo
    Park, Yejong
    Jun, Eunsung
    Kim, Song Cheol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (07) : 1 - 10
  • [44] Laparoscopic versus Open Appendicectomy - A Prospective Comparative Study of 100 Patients
    Ali, Mansab
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Asim, Fatima
    Mahmood, Zahid
    Imran, Muneer
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2011, 5 (03): : 531 - 533
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Clinical Comparative Study
    Li, Z.
    Ying, X.
    Shen, Y.
    Ye, P.
    Pan, W.
    Chen, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (04) : 1599 - 1607
  • [46] Acquiring surgical skills: A comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery
    Subramonian, K
    DeSylva, S
    Bishai, P
    Thompson, P
    Muir, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (03) : 346 - 351
  • [47] Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Marano, Alessandra
    Choi, Yoon Young
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Kim, Jieun
    Noh, Sung Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2013, 13 (03) : 136 - 148
  • [48] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Kuen-Lin
    Lee, Ko-Chao
    Liu, Chia-Cheng
    Chen, Hong-Hwa
    Lu, Chien-Chang
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 34 (03) : 203 - 215
  • [49] Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results
    Topal, B.
    Fieuws, S.
    Aerts, R.
    Vandeweyer, H.
    Penninckx, F.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (10): : 2208 - 2213
  • [50] Surgical Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Comparative Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery
    Salman, Mohamed AbdAlla
    Issa, Mohamed
    Salman, Ahmed
    Tourky, Mohamed
    Elewa, Ahmed
    Alrahawy, Mahmoud
    Shetty, Neehar
    Elsherbiney, Mohammed
    Elhaj, Mujahid Gasemelseed Fadlallah
    Shaaban, Hossam El-Din
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (05) : 586 - 594