Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis

被引:38
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Cobb, William. S. [1 ]
Kercher, Kent W. [1 ]
Heniford, B. Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Carolinas Laparoscop & Adv Surg Program, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
关键词
laparoscopy; colostomy reversal; comparative trial; colorectal surgery; Hartmann's procedure;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Open colostomy reversal carries significant rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia which often limit its acceptance. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach to the restoration of intestinal continuity may result in lower perioperative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic colostomy reversals performed at a single institution were identified and compared to 22 randomly selected open colostomy closures performed during the same time period. Patients were compared based on demographics, previous indications for colostomy procedures, and perioperative outcomes. A total of 152 patients underwent reversal of left-sided colostomies during the study period. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 of 22 cases;, there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to inability to adequately mobilize the rectal stump. The laparoscopic and open groups were 2 comparable based on mean age (54 years versus 49 years; P = 0.23), BMI (26 kg/m(2) versus 27 kg/m(2); P = 0.66), gender (9% males versus 13% males; P = 0.23), ASA Class (2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.07), and history of previous intra-abdominal sepsis (17 versus 16 cases). Operative times were similar (158 versus 189 minutes; P = 0.16), and estimated blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113 versus 270 ml; P = 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred in the laparoscopic group and two enterotomies occurred in the open group. The laparoscopic group had earlier passage of flatus (3.5 versus 5.0 days, P = 0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 versus 7.3 days; P = 0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) laparoscopic and 13 (59%) open cases (P = 0.01). There was no mortality in this series. The laparoscopic approach can be safely used in the restoration of intestinal continuity. It results in a decreased perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, and it offers distinct advantages over the open approach to colostomy reversal.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 900
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study
    Reghunandanan, Renjul Pulikkal
    Usman, Azif Ali
    Basheer, Shiraz
    Kuttichi, Lavith
    Jojo, Joicy Els
    Rasheed, Muhamed Fawas Abdul
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [32] Laparoscopic Versus Open Biliopancreatic Diversion: A Prospective Comparative Study
    Valerio Ceriani
    Tiziana Lodi
    Andrea Porta
    Paolo Gaffuri
    Edoardo Faleschini
    Oscar Roncaglia
    Chiara Osio
    Massimiliano Coladonato
    Ahmed Elnabil-Mortada
    Obesity Surgery, 2010, 20 : 1348 - 1353
  • [33] Laparoscopic Versus Open Biliopancreatic Diversion: A Prospective Comparative Study
    Ceriani, Valerio
    Lodi, Tiziana
    Porta, Andrea
    Gaffuri, Paolo
    Faleschini, Edoardo
    Roncaglia, Oscar
    Osio, Chiara
    Coladonato, Massimiliano
    Elnabil-Mortada, Ahmed
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2010, 20 (10) : 1348 - 1353
  • [34] Open vs laparoscopic approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review
    Siddiqui, M. R. S.
    Sajid, M. S.
    Baig, M. K.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (08) : 733 - 741
  • [35] Bowel preparation for colostomy reversal in children
    Rosenfeld, Eric H.
    Yu, Yangyang R.
    Fernandes, Nathaniel J.
    Karediya, Aleena
    Wesson, David E.
    Lopez, Monica E.
    Shah, Sohail R.
    Vogel, Adam M.
    Brandt, Mary L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (05) : 1045 - 1048
  • [36] A retrospective case note review of laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure
    Walklett, C. L.
    Yeomans, N. P.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2014, 96 (07) : 539 - 542
  • [37] Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies
    Kiblawi, Rim
    Zoeller, Christoph
    Zanini, Andrea
    Kuebler, Joachim F.
    Dingemann, Carmen
    Ure, Benno
    Schukfeh, Nagoud
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2022, 32 (01) : 9 - 25
  • [38] Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among medicare beneficiaries
    Khan, Aqsa
    Alperin, Marianna
    Wu, Ning
    Clemens, J. Quentin
    Dubina, Emily
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (11) : 1883 - 1891
  • [39] Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among medicare beneficiaries
    Aqsa Khan
    Marianna Alperin
    Ning Wu
    J. Quentin Clemens
    Emily Dubina
    Chris L. Pashos
    Jennifer T. Anger
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24 : 1883 - 1891
  • [40] Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection
    Rowe, Andrea J.
    Meneghetti, Adam T.
    Schumacher, P. Andrew
    Buczkowski, Andrzej K.
    Scudamore, Charles H.
    Panton, O. Neely M.
    Chung, Stephen W.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (06): : 1198 - 1203