Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis

被引:38
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Cobb, William. S. [1 ]
Kercher, Kent W. [1 ]
Heniford, B. Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Carolinas Laparoscop & Adv Surg Program, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
关键词
laparoscopy; colostomy reversal; comparative trial; colorectal surgery; Hartmann's procedure;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.11.008
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Open colostomy reversal carries significant rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia which often limit its acceptance. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach to the restoration of intestinal continuity may result in lower perioperative morbidity and faster postoperative recovery. Twenty-two cases of laparoscopic colostomy reversals performed at a single institution were identified and compared to 22 randomly selected open colostomy closures performed during the same time period. Patients were compared based on demographics, previous indications for colostomy procedures, and perioperative outcomes. A total of 152 patients underwent reversal of left-sided colostomies during the study period. The laparoscopic approach was successful in 20 of 22 cases;, there were 2 conversions to open (9%) secondary to inability to adequately mobilize the rectal stump. The laparoscopic and open groups were 2 comparable based on mean age (54 years versus 49 years; P = 0.23), BMI (26 kg/m(2) versus 27 kg/m(2); P = 0.66), gender (9% males versus 13% males; P = 0.23), ASA Class (2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.07), and history of previous intra-abdominal sepsis (17 versus 16 cases). Operative times were similar (158 versus 189 minutes; P = 0.16), and estimated blood loss was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (113 versus 270 ml; P = 0.01). No intraoperative complications occurred in the laparoscopic group and two enterotomies occurred in the open group. The laparoscopic group had earlier passage of flatus (3.5 versus 5.0 days, P = 0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 versus 7.3 days; P = 0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) laparoscopic and 13 (59%) open cases (P = 0.01). There was no mortality in this series. The laparoscopic approach can be safely used in the restoration of intestinal continuity. It results in a decreased perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, and it offers distinct advantages over the open approach to colostomy reversal.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 900
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus open adenomectomy: A comparative study
    Angel Bergero, Miguel
    Manuel Alvarez, Juan
    Cruz Liyo, Juan
    Dourado, Leandro
    Menendez, Nicolas
    Carlos, David
    Dipatto, Fernando
    Tirapegui, Sebastian
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (04): : 268 - 273
  • [22] Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy
    Okhrimenko, H. I.
    Holovko, M. H.
    Hrushka, V. A.
    Haidarzhi, Ye. I.
    Podluzhnyi, O. O.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, (05) : 664 - 667
  • [23] Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective review
    Yang, Phillip F.
    Morgan, Matthew J.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (12) : 965 - 969
  • [24] Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy versus Open Appendicectomy
    Reddy, B. Karunakar
    Srinivas, T.
    Sindhu, A. Nyna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (09) : 8 - 11
  • [25] Comparison between open and laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Brunetti, Francesco
    Memeo, Riccardo
    da Costa, Jose Batista
    Schneck, Anne Sophie
    Carra, Maria Clotilde
    Azoulay, Daniel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 5 (08): : 245 - 251
  • [26] Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients
    Gill, IS
    Matin, SF
    Desai, MM
    Kaouk, JH
    Steinberg, A
    Mascha, E
    Thornton, J
    Sherief, MH
    Strzempkowski, B
    Novick, AC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [27] Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes at a Single Institution
    Jarufe, Nicolas
    Soto, Pedro
    Ahumada, Vanessa
    Pacheco, Sergio
    Salinas, Jose
    Galindo, Jose
    Bachler, Jean-Phillipe
    Achurra, Pablo
    Rebolledo, Rolando
    Guerra, Juan F.
    Briceno, Eduardo
    Martinez, Jorge
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [28] Preliminary results of Polish national multicenter study on colostomy reversal - LICO (Liquidation of Colostomy) study
    Kisielewski, Michal
    Wojewoda, Tomasz
    Richter, Karolina
    Wysocki, Michal
    Jankowski, Michal
    Krawczyk, Wiktor
    Wantulok, Jakub
    Jelenska-Bienkowska, Karolina
    Stanczak, Michal
    Grudzinska, Ewa
    Molasy, Bartosz
    Komorowski, Andrzej L.
    Zdrojewski, Michal
    Sachanbinski, Tomasz
    Franczak, Paula
    Wierdak, Mateusz
    Dowgiallo-Gornowicz, Natalia
    Wysocki, Wojciech M.
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2024, 19 (02) : 198 - 204
  • [29] Laparoscopic Versus Open Reversal of a Hartmann Procedure: A Single-Center Study
    Zimmermann, Markus
    Hoffmann, Martin
    Laubert, Tilman
    Meyer, Karl-Frederik
    Jungbluth, Thomas
    Roblick, Uwe-Johannes
    Bruch, Hans-Peter
    Schloericke, Erik
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (08) : 2145 - 2152
  • [30] Laparoscopic Versus Open Biliopancreatic Diversion: A Prospective Comparative Study
    Valerio Ceriani
    Tiziana Lodi
    Andrea Porta
    Paolo Gaffuri
    Edoardo Faleschini
    Oscar Roncaglia
    Chiara Osio
    Massimiliano Coladonato
    Ahmed Elnabil-Mortada
    Obesity Surgery, 2010, 20 : 1348 - 1353