The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees

被引:219
作者
Wang, Ying-Ming
Yang, Jian-Bo
Xu, Dong-Ling
Chin, Kwai-Sang
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Fujian 350002, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Ctr Accounting Studies, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
multiple attribute decision analysis; the evidential reasoning approach; uncertainty modeling; interval degrees of belief; interval data; nonlinear optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.034
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA) problems having both quantitative and qualitative attributes under uncertainty can be modeled using the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. Several types of uncertainties such as ignorance and fuzziness can be modeled in the ER framework. In this paper, the ER approach will be extended to model new types of uncertainties including interval belief degrees and interval data that could be incurred in decision situations such as group decision making. The Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory of evidence is first extended, which is one of the bases of the ER approach. The analytical ER algorithm is used to combine all evidence simultaneously. Two pairs of nonlinear optimization models are constructed to estimate the upper and lower bounds of the combined belief degrees and to compute the maximum and the minimum expected utilities of each alternative, respectively. Interval data are equivalently transformed to interval belief degrees and are incorporated into the nonlinear optimization models. A cargo ship selection problem is examined to show the implementation process of the proposed approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 66
页数:32
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]   Attribute sampling: A belief-function approach to statistical audit evidence [J].
Gillett, PR ;
Srivastava, RP .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2000, 19 (01) :145-155
[22]   Similarity-based inference as evidential reasoning [J].
Hüllermeier, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2001, 26 (02) :67-100
[23]  
ISHIZUKA M, 2002, INFORM SCI, V15, P77
[24]   A framework for intelligent medical diagnosis using the theory of evidence [J].
Jones, RW ;
Lowe, A ;
Harrison, MJ .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2002, 15 (1-2) :77-84
[25]  
Keeney R.L., 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[26]   A comparative evaluation of belief revision models in auditing [J].
Krishnamoorthy, G ;
Mock, TJ ;
Washington, MT .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 1999, 18 (02) :105-127
[27]   AN INTERVAL DEMPSTER-SHAFER APPROACH [J].
LEE, ES ;
ZHU, Q .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1992, 24 (07) :89-95
[28]  
Liu L, 2004, SIGMOD RECORD, V33, P2
[29]   Generalization of the Dempster-Shafer theory: A fuzzy-valued measure [J].
Lucas, C ;
Araabi, BN .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 1999, 7 (03) :255-270
[30]   Analyzing linear regression models with hints and the Dempster-Shafer theory [J].
Monney, PA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (01) :5-29