The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees

被引:219
作者
Wang, Ying-Ming
Yang, Jian-Bo
Xu, Dong-Ling
Chin, Kwai-Sang
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Fujian 350002, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Ctr Accounting Studies, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
multiple attribute decision analysis; the evidential reasoning approach; uncertainty modeling; interval degrees of belief; interval data; nonlinear optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.034
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA) problems having both quantitative and qualitative attributes under uncertainty can be modeled using the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. Several types of uncertainties such as ignorance and fuzziness can be modeled in the ER framework. In this paper, the ER approach will be extended to model new types of uncertainties including interval belief degrees and interval data that could be incurred in decision situations such as group decision making. The Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory of evidence is first extended, which is one of the bases of the ER approach. The analytical ER algorithm is used to combine all evidence simultaneously. Two pairs of nonlinear optimization models are constructed to estimate the upper and lower bounds of the combined belief degrees and to compute the maximum and the minimum expected utilities of each alternative, respectively. Interval data are equivalently transformed to interval belief degrees and are incorporated into the nonlinear optimization models. A cargo ship selection problem is examined to show the implementation process of the proposed approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 66
页数:32
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J MULTI-CRITERIA DEC
[2]   Approximation algorithms and decision making in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence - An empirical study [J].
Bauer, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1997, 17 (2-3) :217-237
[3]   A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting [J].
Bell, TB ;
Carcello, JV .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2000, 19 (01) :169-184
[4]   Belief functions and default reasoning [J].
Benferhat, S ;
Saffiotti, A ;
Smets, P .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 122 (1-2) :1-69
[5]   DS/AHP method: A mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty [J].
Beynon, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (01) :148-164
[6]   An expert system for multi-criteria decision making using Dempster Shafer theory [J].
Beynon, M ;
Cosker, D ;
Marshall, D .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2001, 20 (04) :357-367
[7]   The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling [J].
Beynon, M ;
Curry, B ;
Morgan, P .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 28 (01) :37-50
[8]  
Binaghi E, 1999, INT J INTELL SYST, V14, P559, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199906)14:6<559::AID-INT2>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-#
[10]   A neural model for fuzzy Dempster-Shafer classifiers [J].
Binaghi, E ;
Gallo, I ;
Madella, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2000, 25 (02) :89-121