Going beyond "it depends:" the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management

被引:35
作者
Baker, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Chapin, F. Stuart, III [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sustainable Places Res Inst, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Social Sci, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Inst Arctic Biol, Fairbanks, AK USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2018年 / 23卷 / 01期
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
deliberative democracy; inequity; institutional constraints; instrumental values; normative values; participation; social structures; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; DECISION-MAKING; PROJECT DESIGN; COMMUNITY; COMANAGEMENT; VALUES;
D O I
10.5751/ES-09868-230120
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Public participation is increasingly advocated in natural resource management to meet a spectrum of instrumental to normative goals. However, the success of participation in achieving these goals is highly variable, depending on both societal and institutional contexts. Whether participation realises its benefits or succumbs to its pitfalls is shaped by dynamic interactions operating among three contextual dimensions: participatory rationales (instrumental to normative), institutional fit of different levels (types) of participation (information delivery to partnership to delegation), and social structures (such as cultural context, social capital, and power distribution). Some levels of participation may support the existing power hierarchy, others benefit organized stakeholder groups and special interests, and still others foster deliberative democratic outcomes. We argue that wise choice of levels of participation in particular contexts shapes the balance of participation's benefits and pitfalls.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Abelson J., 2006, ASSESSING IMPACTS PU
[2]   Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal's Terai [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gupta, K .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1101-1114
[3]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[4]   Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo- liberal era [J].
Alejandro Leal, Pablo .
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2007, 17 (4-5) :539-548
[5]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[6]   The institutional design of forest certification standards initiatives and its influence on the role of science: the case of forest genetic resources [J].
Auld, G ;
Bull, GQ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 69 (01) :47-62
[7]  
Baker Susan., 2008, In Pursuit of Sustainable Development: New Governance Practices at the Sub- National Level in Europe
[8]   Decentralization and people's participation in conservation: a comparative study from the Western Terai of Nepal [J].
Baral, Nabin ;
Heinen, Joel T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2007, 14 (05) :520-531
[9]   The quality of stakeholder-based decisions [J].
Beierle, TC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (04) :739-749
[10]  
Biggs S., 1989, RESOURCE POOR FARMER