Extraneural versus Intraneural Stimulation Thresholds during Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block

被引:141
作者
Bigeleisen, Paul E. [2 ,3 ]
Moayeri, Nizar
Groen, Gerbrand J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Perioperat Care & Emergency Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Linden Oaks Surg Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Penfield, NY USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; NERVE-STIMULATION; MOTOR RESPONSE; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; INJECTION INJURY; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; INTERSCALENE BLOCK; DIABETES-MELLITUS; LOCALIZATION; PARESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a59891
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: A stimulation current of no more than 0.5mA is regarded as safe in avoiding nerve injury and delivering adequate stimulus to provoke a motor response. However, there is no consistent level of stimulating threshold that reliably indicates intraneural placement of the needle. The authors determined the minimally required stimulation threshold to elicit a motor response outside and inside the most superficial part of the brachial plexus during high-resolution, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block. Methods: After Institutional review board approval, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block was performed on 55 patients. Patients with neurologic dysfunction were excluded. Criteria for extraneural and intraneural stimulation were defined and assessed by independent experts. To determine success rate and any residual neurologic deficit, qualitative sensory and motor examinations were performed before and after block placement. At 6 month follow-up, the patients were examined for any neurologic deficit. Results: Thirty-nine patients met all set stimulation criteria. Median +/- SD (interquartile range) minimum stimulation threshold outside was 0.60 +/- 0.37 mA (0.40, 1.0) and inside 0.30 +/- 0.19 mA (0.20, 0.40). The difference of 0.30 mA was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Stimulation currents of 0.2 mA or less were not observed outside the trunk in any patient. Significantly higher thresholds were observed in diabetic patients. Success rate was 100% after 20 min. Thirty-four patients had normal sensory and motor examination at 6 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study and the use of ultrasound, a stimulation current of 0.2 mA or less is reliable to detect intraneural placement of the needle. Furthermore, stimulation currents of more than 0.2 and no more than 0.5 mA could not rule out intraneural position.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in a patient with a cervical rib
    Watanabe, Tatsunori
    Yanabashi, Kazuhito
    Moriya, Koji
    Maki, Yutaka
    Tsubokawa, Naoto
    Baba, Hiroshi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2015, 62 (06): : 671 - 673
  • [12] Risk factors for insufficient ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Shingo Abe
    Hiroki Kondo
    Yohei Tomiyama
    Toshiki Shimada
    Masayuki Bun
    Kohji Kuriyama
    Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 10
  • [13] Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in a patient with a cervical rib
    Tatsunori Watanabe
    Kazuhito Yanabashi
    Koji Moriya
    Yutaka Maki
    Naoto Tsubokawa
    Hiroshi Baba
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2015, 62 : 671 - 673
  • [14] The role of peripheral nerve stimulation in the era of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia
    Gadsden, J. C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 : 65 - 73
  • [15] Pneumothorax as a Complication of the Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Approach for Brachial Plexus Block
    Bhatia, Anuj
    Lai, Jacob
    Chan, Vincent W. S.
    Brull, Richard
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (03) : 817 - 819
  • [16] Risk factors for insufficient ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Abe, Shingo
    Kondo, Hiroki
    Tomiyama, Yohei
    Shimada, Toshiki
    Bun, Masayuki
    Kuriyama, Kohji
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [17] Incidence of unintentional intraneural injection and postoperative neurological complications with ultrasound-guided interscalene and supraclavicular nerve blocks
    Liu, S. S.
    YaDeau, J. T.
    Shaw, P. M.
    Wilfred, S.
    Shetty, T.
    Gordon, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (03) : 168 - 174
  • [18] Diaphragmatic and Pulmonary Functions Following an Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Approach Versus a Costoclavicular Approach of a Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Study
    Saraswat, Rajkumar K.
    Deganwa, Mangilal
    Verma, Kalpana
    Bharadwaj, Avnish
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [19] Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
    Stav, Anatoli
    Reytman, Leonid
    Stav, Michael-Yohay
    Portnoy, Isaak
    Kantarovsky, Alexander
    Galili, Offer
    Luboshitz, Shmuel
    Sevi, Roger
    Sternberg, Ahud
    RAMBAM MAIMONIDES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 7 (02):
  • [20] Is nerve stimulation needed during an ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block?
    Gurkan, Y.
    Tekin, M.
    Acar, S.
    Solak, M.
    Toker, K.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 54 (04) : 403 - 407