Extraneural versus Intraneural Stimulation Thresholds during Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block

被引:143
|
作者
Bigeleisen, Paul E. [2 ,3 ]
Moayeri, Nizar
Groen, Gerbrand J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Perioperat Care & Emergency Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Linden Oaks Surg Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Penfield, NY USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; NERVE-STIMULATION; MOTOR RESPONSE; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; INJECTION INJURY; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; INTERSCALENE BLOCK; DIABETES-MELLITUS; LOCALIZATION; PARESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a59891
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: A stimulation current of no more than 0.5mA is regarded as safe in avoiding nerve injury and delivering adequate stimulus to provoke a motor response. However, there is no consistent level of stimulating threshold that reliably indicates intraneural placement of the needle. The authors determined the minimally required stimulation threshold to elicit a motor response outside and inside the most superficial part of the brachial plexus during high-resolution, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block. Methods: After Institutional review board approval, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block was performed on 55 patients. Patients with neurologic dysfunction were excluded. Criteria for extraneural and intraneural stimulation were defined and assessed by independent experts. To determine success rate and any residual neurologic deficit, qualitative sensory and motor examinations were performed before and after block placement. At 6 month follow-up, the patients were examined for any neurologic deficit. Results: Thirty-nine patients met all set stimulation criteria. Median +/- SD (interquartile range) minimum stimulation threshold outside was 0.60 +/- 0.37 mA (0.40, 1.0) and inside 0.30 +/- 0.19 mA (0.20, 0.40). The difference of 0.30 mA was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Stimulation currents of 0.2 mA or less were not observed outside the trunk in any patient. Significantly higher thresholds were observed in diabetic patients. Success rate was 100% after 20 min. Thirty-four patients had normal sensory and motor examination at 6 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study and the use of ultrasound, a stimulation current of 0.2 mA or less is reliable to detect intraneural placement of the needle. Furthermore, stimulation currents of more than 0.2 and no more than 0.5 mA could not rule out intraneural position.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block: What Is Intraneural?
    Morfey, Dorothea
    Brull, Richard
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (01) : 250 - 251
  • [2] Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block: What Is Intraneural? Reply
    Bigeleisen, Paul E.
    Groen, Gerbrand
    Moayeri, Nizar
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (01) : 251 - 252
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block
    Arcand, GV
    Williams, SR
    Chouinard, P
    Boudreault, D
    Harris, P
    Ruel, M
    Girard, F
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (03): : 886 - 890
  • [4] Ultrasound-guided block and the incidence of intraneural injection
    Szerb, J.
    Kwofie, M. Kwesi
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (07) : 913 - 914
  • [5] Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block Is It Really Safer?
    Aguirre, Jose
    Ekatodramis, Georgios
    Ruland, Philipp
    Borgeat, Alain
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (06) : 622 - 622
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: Initial experience
    Kathleen Doyle
    Ban Tsui
    Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2008, 55 (Suppl 1) : 4758171 - 4758172
  • [7] Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Chan, VWS
    Perlas, A
    Rawson, R
    Odukoya, O
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05): : 1514 - 1517
  • [8] Novel ultrasound-guided supraclavicular stellate ganglion block
    Perez, Mario Fajardo
    Yamak-Altinpulluk, Ece
    Tafur, Rodrigo Diez
    Salazar-Zamorano, Carlos H.
    Espinosa Morales, Karla
    Oliver-Fornies, Pablo
    Rocha-Romero, Andres
    Urena, Ricardo Aguilar
    Juarez-Lemus, Angel
    Galluccio, Felice
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (05) : 808 - 814
  • [9] Respiratory distress after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block
    Lie, J.
    Hulgur, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 : 90 - 90
  • [10] Atypical "Corner Pocket" for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block
    Murata, Hiroaki
    Sakai, Akiko
    Sumikawa, Koji
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (04) : 415 - 416