Extraneural versus Intraneural Stimulation Thresholds during Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block

被引:144
作者
Bigeleisen, Paul E. [2 ,3 ]
Moayeri, Nizar
Groen, Gerbrand J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Perioperat Care & Emergency Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Linden Oaks Surg Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Penfield, NY USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; NERVE-STIMULATION; MOTOR RESPONSE; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; INJECTION INJURY; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; INTERSCALENE BLOCK; DIABETES-MELLITUS; LOCALIZATION; PARESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a59891
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: A stimulation current of no more than 0.5mA is regarded as safe in avoiding nerve injury and delivering adequate stimulus to provoke a motor response. However, there is no consistent level of stimulating threshold that reliably indicates intraneural placement of the needle. The authors determined the minimally required stimulation threshold to elicit a motor response outside and inside the most superficial part of the brachial plexus during high-resolution, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block. Methods: After Institutional review board approval, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block was performed on 55 patients. Patients with neurologic dysfunction were excluded. Criteria for extraneural and intraneural stimulation were defined and assessed by independent experts. To determine success rate and any residual neurologic deficit, qualitative sensory and motor examinations were performed before and after block placement. At 6 month follow-up, the patients were examined for any neurologic deficit. Results: Thirty-nine patients met all set stimulation criteria. Median +/- SD (interquartile range) minimum stimulation threshold outside was 0.60 +/- 0.37 mA (0.40, 1.0) and inside 0.30 +/- 0.19 mA (0.20, 0.40). The difference of 0.30 mA was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Stimulation currents of 0.2 mA or less were not observed outside the trunk in any patient. Significantly higher thresholds were observed in diabetic patients. Success rate was 100% after 20 min. Thirty-four patients had normal sensory and motor examination at 6 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study and the use of ultrasound, a stimulation current of 0.2 mA or less is reliable to detect intraneural placement of the needle. Furthermore, stimulation currents of more than 0.2 and no more than 0.5 mA could not rule out intraneural position.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Risk factors for diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy - Results of the Seattle Prospective Diabetic Foot Study [J].
Adler, AI ;
Boyko, EJ ;
Ahroni, JH ;
Stensel, V ;
Forsberg, RC ;
Smith, DG .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (07) :1162-1167
[2]   Use of a nerve stimulator does not improve the efficacy of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve blocks [J].
Beach, Michael L. ;
Sites, Brian D. ;
Gallagher, John D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2006, 18 (08) :580-584
[3]   Nerve puncture and apparent intraneural injection during ultrasound-guided axillary block does not invariably result in neurologic injury [J].
Bigeleisen, Paul E. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (04) :779-783
[4]  
Borgeat Alain, 2004, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, V17, P417
[5]   Ultrasound detects intraneural injection [J].
Brull, Richard ;
Chan, Vincent W. S. ;
McCartney, Colin J. L. ;
Perlas, Anahi ;
Xu, Daquan .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 106 (06) :1244-1244
[6]   An ultrasonographic and histological study of intraneural injection and electrical stimulation in pigs [J].
Chan, Vincent W. S. ;
Brull, Richard ;
McCartney, Colin J. L. ;
Xu, Daquan ;
Abbas, Sherif ;
Shannon, Patrick .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (05) :1281-1284
[7]   Ultrasound evidence of intraneural injection [J].
Chan, VWS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (02) :610-611
[8]   Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Chan, VWS ;
Perlas, A ;
Rawson, R ;
Odukoya, O .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05) :1514-1517
[9]   What is the relationship between paresthesia and nerve stimulation for axillary brachial plexus block? [J].
Choyce, A ;
Chan, VWS ;
Middleton, WJ ;
Knight, PR ;
Peng, P ;
McCartney, CJL .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (02) :100-104
[10]   Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A modified plumb-bob technique [J].
Collins, Adam B. ;
Gray, Andrew T. ;
Kessler, Jens .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (06) :591-592