Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: A case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes

被引:56
作者
Kirsh, Susan R. [1 ,2 ]
Lawrence, Renee H. [1 ]
Aron, David C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Louis Stokes Cleveland Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Improvement Res, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1748-5908-3-34
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Incorporating shared medical appointments (SMAs) or group visits into clinical practice to improve care and increase efficiency has become a popular intervention, but the processes to implement and sustain them have not been well described. The purpose of this study was to describe the process of implementation of SMAs in the local context of a primary care clinic over time. Methods: The setting was a primary care clinic of an urban academic medical center of the Veterans Health Administration. We performed an in-depth case analysis utilizing both an innovations framework and a nested systems framework approach. This analysis helped organize and summarize implementation and sustainability issues, specifically: the pre-SMA local context; the processes of tailoring and implementation of the intervention; and the evolution and sustainability of the intervention and its context. Results: Both the improvement intervention and the local context co-adapted and evolved during implementation, ensuring sustainability. The most important promoting factors were the formation of a core team committed to quality and improvement, and the clinic leadership that was supported strongly by the team members. Tailoring had to also take into account key innovation-hindering factors, including limited resources (such as space), potential to alter longstanding patient-provider relationships, and organizational silos (disconnected groups) with core team members reporting to different supervisors. Conclusion: Although interventions must be designed to meet the needs of the sites in which they are implemented, specific guidance tailored to the practice environment was lacking. SMAs require complex changes that impact on care routines, collaborations, and various organizational levels. Although the SMA was not envisioned originally as a form of system redesign that would alter the context in which it was implemented, it became clear that tailoring the intervention alone would not ensure sustainability, and therefore adjustments to the system were required. The innovation necessitated reconfiguring some aspects of the primary care clinic itself and other services from which the patients and the team were derived. In addition, the relationships among different parts of the system were altered.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: Results from a Canadian comparative study
    Abelson, Julia
    Forest, Pierre-Gerlier
    Eyles, John
    Casebeer, Ann
    Martin, Elisabeth
    Mackean, Gail
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (10) : 2115 - 2128
  • [2] Case study research: The view from complexity science
    Anderson, RA
    Crabtree, BE
    Steele, DJ
    McDaniel, RR
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (05) : 669 - 685
  • [3] BATALDEN P, 2003, JOINT COMM J QUAL IM, V29, pM575
  • [4] Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis
    Bosch, Marije
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Wensing, Michel
    Grol, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 13 (02) : 161 - 168
  • [5] The role of patient, physician and systemic factors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Brown, JB
    Harris, SB
    Webster-Bogaert, S
    Wetmore, S
    Faulds, C
    Stewart, M
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 19 (04) : 344 - 349
  • [6] The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit
    Castro, FG
    Barrera, M
    Martinez, CR
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2004, 5 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [7] Crabtree B.F., 1999, DOING QUALITATIVE RE, P163, DOI DOI 10.1046/J.0966-0429.2001.00289.X
  • [8] Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project
    Davidoff, F
    Batalden, P
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 14 (05): : 319 - 325
  • [9] Davies B, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V167, P469
  • [10] Demakis JG, 2000, MED CARE, V38, pS17