Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations

被引:123
作者
Wardle, J
McCaffery, K
Nadel, M
Atkin, W
机构
[1] UCL, Canc Res UK Hlth Behav Unit, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] St Marks Hosp, Canc Res UK Colorectal Canc Unit, Harrow, Middx, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
UK; stress; social support; cancer scrcening; colorectal cancer; socioeconomic status;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.030
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper compares psychosocial and cognitive models of socioeconomic variation in participation in screening for colorectal cancer. The psychosocial model suggests that factors such as higher stress and lower social support explain, in part, why people from lower socioeconomic status (SES) environments are less likely to participate in screening. The cognitive model suggests that beliefs about cancer risk and screening will play an important part in differential participation. In practice both sets of factors may contribute to explaining socioeconomic differentials. The data for these analyses are drawn from a randomised controlled trial of colorcctal cancer screening (the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial). The participants are from the Scottish centre, where recruitment was stratified to generate a socioeconomically diverse sample. The dependent variable was interest in attending screening. A questionnaire covering demographic status, psychosocial and cognitive factors as well as interest in screening was sent to 10,650 adults. The results showed the predicted SES gradient in interest. There were also SES differences in both psychosocial and cognitive variables. A series of logistic regression models were used to test potential mediators of the association between SES and interest in attending screening by successively including psychosocial factors, cognitive factors, and then both, in the equation. Only the inclusion of the cognitive variables significantly reduced the variation associated with SES, providing better support for the cognitive than the psychosocial model. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 261
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND HEALTH - THE CHALLENGE OF THE GRADIENT [J].
ADLER, NE ;
BOYCE, T ;
CHESNEY, MA ;
COHEN, S ;
FOLKMAN, S ;
KAHN, RL ;
SYME, SL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (01) :15-24
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOC DETERMINANTS HLT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, HLTH DEPRIVATION INE
[4]   SOCIAL CLASS, LIFE EXPECTANCY AND OVERALL MORTALITY [J].
ANTONOVSKY, A .
MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1967, 45 (02) :31-73
[5]   Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Cook, CF ;
Cuzick, J ;
Edwards, R ;
Northover, JMA ;
Wardle, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) :1291-1300
[6]   PREVENTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER BY ONCE-ONLY SIGMOIDOSCOPY [J].
ATKIN, WS ;
CUZICK, J ;
NORTHOVER, JMA ;
WHYNES, DK .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8847) :736-740
[7]   Design of a multicentre randomised trial to evaluate flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Edwards, R ;
Wardle, J ;
Northover, JMA ;
Sutton, S ;
Hart, AR ;
Williams, CB ;
Cuzick, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2001, 8 (03) :137-144
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]   Socioeconomic status and chronic stress - Does stress account for SES effects on health? [J].
Baum, A ;
Garofalo, JP ;
Yali, AM .
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH IN INDUSTRIAL NATIONS: SOCIAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS, 1999, 896 :131-144
[10]  
Belloc N B, 1972, Prev Med, V1, P409, DOI 10.1016/0091-7435(72)90014-X