Sorption and stability of mercury on activated carbon for emission control

被引:69
作者
Graydon, John W. [1 ]
Zhang, Xinzhi [1 ]
Kirk, Donald W. [1 ]
Jia, Charles Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem Engn & Appl Chem, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, Canada
关键词
Mercury capture; Sequential extraction; Mercury sequestration; Flue gas; Sulfur-impregnated carbon; GAS-PHASE MERCURY; SULFUR IMPREGNATION; SEQUENTIAL EXTRACTIONS; REMOVAL; OPTIMIZATION; TEMPERATURE; INJECTION; SORBENTS; DESIGN; FIBERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.118
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A leading strategy for control of mercury emissions from combustion processes involves removal of elemental mercury from the flue gas by injection of activated carbon sorbent. After particulate capture and disposal in a landfill, it is critical that the captured mercury remains permanently sequestered in the sorbent. The environmental stability of sorbed mercury was determined on two commercial, activated carbons, one impregnated using gaseous sulfur, and on two activated carbons that were impregnated with sulfur by reaction with SO(2). After loading with mercury vapor using a static technique, the stability of the sorbed mercury was characterized by two leaching methods. The standard toxicity characteristic leaching procedure showed leachate concentrations well below the limit of 0.2 mg/L for all activated carbons. The nature of the sorbed mercury was further characterized by a sequential extraction scheme that was specifically optimized to distinguish clearly among the highly stable phases of mercury. This analysis revealed that there are two forms in which mercury is sequestered. In the sorbent that was impregnated by gaseous sulfur at a relatively low temperature, the mercury is present predominantly as HgS. In the other three sorbents, including two impregnated using SO(2), the mercury is predominantly present in the elemental form, physisorbed and chemisorbed to thiophene groups on the carbon surface. Both forms of binding are sufficiently stable to provide permanent sequestration of mercury in activated carbon sorbents after disposal. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 982
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, 1311 US EPA
[2]  
Cooney CM, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P1061
[3]   Sulfurization of a carbon surface for vapor phase mercury removal - II: Sulfur forms and mercury uptake [J].
Feng, Wenguo ;
Borguet, Eric ;
Vidic, Radisav D. .
CARBON, 2006, 44 (14) :2998-3004
[4]   Sulfur impregnation on activated carbon fibers through H2S oxidation for vapor phase mercury removal [J].
Feng, WG ;
Kwon, S ;
Feng, X ;
Borguet, E ;
Vidic, RD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (03) :292-300
[5]   The design and application of sequential extractions for mercury, Part 2. Resorption of mercury onto the sample during leaching [J].
Hall, GEM ;
Pelchat, P .
GEOCHEMISTRY-EXPLORATION ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS, 2005, 5 :115-121
[6]   The design and application of sequential extractions for mercury, Part 1.: Optimization of HNO3 extraction for all non-sulphide forms of Hg [J].
Hall, GEM ;
Pelchat, P ;
Percival, JB .
GEOCHEMISTRY-EXPLORATION ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS, 2005, 5 :107-113
[7]   Mercury adsorption properties of sulfur-impregnated adsorbents [J].
Hsi, HC ;
Rood, MJ ;
Rostam-Abadi, M ;
Chen, SG ;
Chang, R .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2002, 128 (11) :1080-1089
[8]   Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs) [J].
Hsi, HC ;
Rood, MJ ;
Rostam-Abadi, M ;
Chen, SG ;
Chang, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (13) :2785-2791
[9]   XAFS examination of mercury sorption on three activated carbons [J].
Huggins, FE ;
Huffman, GP ;
Dunham, GE ;
Senior, CL .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1999, 13 (01) :114-121
[10]   DOE/NETL's phase II mercury control technology field testing program: Preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection [J].
Jones, Andrew P. ;
Hoffmann, Jeffrey W. ;
Smith, Dennis N. ;
Feeley, Thomas J., III ;
Murphy, James T. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (04) :1365-1371