A novel inpatient complex pain team: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of a single-centre pilot study

被引:0
作者
Mordecai, Luke [1 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [2 ]
Wood, Victoria J. [2 ]
Swart, Nicholas [2 ]
Morris, Stephen [2 ]
Williams, Amanda [3 ]
Curran, Natasha [1 ]
Moonesinghe, Ramani [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp, Pain Management Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[3] UCL, Res Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, London, England
[4] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, NIAA Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; OUTCOMES; PREVALENCE; THERAPY; TRIALS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019058
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Complex pain is a debilitating condition that is responsible for low quality of life and significant economic impacts. Although best practice in the treatment of complex pain employs a multidisciplinary team, many patients do not have access to this care, leading to poor outcomes. Methods and analysis This study evaluates a novel inpatient complex pain team at a large London teaching hospital. A multidisciplinary pain team comprising specialist doctors, nurses, psychologists and physiotherapists was instituted for inpatients with complex pain who will undergo an intense and bespoke evidertcebased programme which will then be integrated into the community. A mixed-methods evaluation will take place and patients will be recruited over the course of 1 year. A qualitative arm will interview 15 staff and 15 patients on recruitment and again 6 months later looking to compare and contrast the new pain team with past experiences of pain management. A quantitative arm will assess clinical outcomes using validated scoring tools. An economic evaluation will seek to evaluate the relative cost of the service by comparing healthcare costs before and after the intervention. Ethics and dissemination The study was categorised as a service evaluation, so formal ethical approval was not considered necessary. Participant recruitment began in January 2016 and the 1-year follow-up will end in November 2017. The results of this study will he published in 2018.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain): study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
    Lee, Jessica
    Currow, David
    Lovell, Melanie
    Phillips, Jane L.
    McLachlan, Andrew
    Ritchie, Megan
    Brown, Linda
    Fazekas, Belinda
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Seah, Davinia
    Sheehan, Caitlin
    Chye, Richard
    Noble, Beverly
    McCaffrey, Nikki
    Aggarwal, Ghauri
    George, Rachel
    Kow, Marian
    Ayoub, Chadi
    Linton, Anthony
    Sanderson, Christine
    Mittal, Dipti
    Rao, Angela
    Prael, Grace
    Urban, Katalin
    Vandersman, Priyanka
    Agar, Meera
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [2] Differences in anaesthesiologist- surgeon seniority and patient safety: a single-centre mixed-methods study
    Xu, Xiaohan
    Yu, Xuerong
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Chu, Hongling
    Zhang, Huan
    Zhang, Xue
    Ma, Shuang
    Wu, Lingeer
    Cui, Quexuan
    Shen, Le
    Huang, Yuguang
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 134 (01) : 192 - 202
  • [3] A mixed-methods feasibility study of a comorbidity-adapted exercise program for low back pain in older adults (COMEBACK): a protocol
    de Luca, Katie
    Yanz, Megan
    Downie, Aron
    Kendall, Julie
    Skou, Soren T.
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    French, Simon D.
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M. A.
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [4] Acupuncture for chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease: a mixed-methods pilot study
    Li, Hongjin
    Patil, Crystal L.
    Molokie, Robert E.
    Njoku, Franklin
    Steffen, Alana D.
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    Schlaeger, Judith M.
    ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 39 (06) : 612 - 618
  • [5] A Pilot Mixed-Methods Study to Establish the Clinical Usefulness of a Chronic Pain Profile (CPP) for Pain Management
    Axon, David R.
    Le, Darlena
    Chien, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16)
  • [6] Evaluation of a novel, multicomponent anxiety management programme for people with intellectual disability: protocol for a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental feasibility study
    Acton, Daniel
    Williams, Jonathan
    Woodrow, Ceri
    Talbot, Grace
    Jones, Steven
    Lane, Steven
    Jaydeokar, Sujeet
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [7] Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol
    Jenniches, Imke
    Lemmen, Clarissa
    Cwik, Jan Christopher
    Kusch, Michael
    Labouvie, Hildegard
    Scholten, Nadine
    Gerlach, Alexander
    Stock, Stephanie
    Samel, Christina
    Hagemeier, Anna
    Hellmich, Martin
    Haas, Peter
    Hallek, Michael
    Pfaff, Holger
    Dresen, Antje
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [8] Feasibility of Applied Gaming During Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Patients With Complex Chronic Pain and Fatigue Complaints: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Vugts, Miel A. P.
    Joosen, Margot C. W.
    van Bergen, Alfonsus H. M. M.
    Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.
    JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2016, 4 (01): : E2 - U47
  • [9] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency in Multimodal Physiotherapy for Postpartum Pelvic Pain: The RASDOP Protocol-A Mixed-Methods Study
    Navarro-Brazalez, Beatriz
    Lorenzo-Gallego, Laura
    Rangel-de la Mata, Paula
    Torres-Lacomba, Maria
    Vergara-Perez, Fernando
    Sanchez-Sanchez, Beatriz
    Izquierdo-Mendez, Nuria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (05)
  • [10] A theory-based hybrid II implementation intervention to improve pain management in Swiss nursing homes: A mixed-methods study protocol
    Brunkert, Thekla
    Ruppen, Wilhelm
    Simon, Michael
    Zuniga, Franziska
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (02) : 432 - 442