The effect of increased microporosity on bone formation within silicate-substituted scaffolds in an ovine posterolateral spinal fusion model

被引:7
|
作者
Coathup, Melanie Jean [1 ]
Blunn, Gordon William [1 ]
Campion, Charlie [2 ,3 ]
Ho, Chih-Yuan [1 ]
Hing, Karin Angela [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London, Inst Orthopaed & Musculoskeletal Sci, Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, Brockley Hill, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Engn & Mat, Dept Mat, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
[3] ApaTech Ltd, 370 Centennial Ave,Centennial Pk, Elstree WD6 3TJ, Herts, England
关键词
bone regeneration; posterolateral spinal fusion; osteoconduction; strut porosity; calcium phosphate; sheep model; bone substitute materials; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE; OSTEOINDUCTIVE BIOMATERIALS; POROUS HYDROXYAPATITE; GRAFT SUBSTITUTES; LUMBAR FUSION; MECHANISMS; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.33614
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This study compared the bone forming capacity of the same formulation of silicate-substituted bone graft substitute materials with different microporosity in an instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion ovine model. Materials with a strut porosity of (i) 22.5% (SiCaP) or (ii) 36.0% (SiCaP(+)) were packed along either side of the spine. Bone apposition rates, % new bone formation, % bone-implant contact, and % graft resorption were quantified at 8, 12, and 24 weeks post surgery. Computed Tomography (CT) was used to grade the formation of fusion bridges between vertebrae. Results showed no significant difference in bone apposition rates, % new bone formation, and % bone-implant contact when the two materials were compared. However, at 8 weeks, a significantly higher CT score was obtained in the SiCaP(+) group (0.83 +/- 0.17) when compared with the SiCaP group (0.17 +/- 0.17; p=0.027). Significantly less scaffold remained in the SiCaP(+) group at 12 weeks (p=0.018). Both SiCaP and SiCaP(+) formulations augmented bone formation. Increasing the strut porosity did not significantly increase bone formation however, at 8 weeks it promoted the formation of more highly mineralized bone resulting in a significantly higher CT score, suggesting the bone tissue formed was more mature. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 805-814, 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 814
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [11] Effect of Whitlockite as a new bone substitute for bone formation in spinal fusion and ectopic ossification animal model
    Jin, Yuan-Zhe
    Zheng, Guang-Bin
    Cho, Minjoon
    Lee, Jae Hyup
    BIOMATERIALS RESEARCH, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [12] Hybrid multilayer coating as the psoralen delivery vehicle promoting bone regeneration on titanium mesh scaffolds in a Posterolateral Spinal Fusion model
    Chen, Yanlin
    Zheng, Gang
    Bian, Yujie
    Ma, Haiwei
    Jin, Chenqiang
    Hu, Zhichao
    Su, Haohan
    Hu, Xinli
    Qian, Zhiyong
    Shen, Liyan
    Ni, Wenfei
    APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY, 2022, 28
  • [13] Effect of Intermittent Administration of Teriparatide (Parathyroid Hormone 1-34) on Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Induced Bone Formation in a Rat Model of Spinal Fusion
    Morimoto, Tokimitsu
    Kaito, Takashi
    Kashii, Masafumi
    Matsuo, Yohei
    Sugiura, Tsuyoshi
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (13) : e107(1)