Ideology and international relations

被引:9
作者
Gries, Peter [1 ]
Yam, Paton Pak Chun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester China Inst, 178 Waterloo Pl,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; PUBLIC-OPINION; FOREIGN-POLICY; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; MORAL FOUNDATIONS; CONSERVATIVES; LIBERALS; AUTHORITARIANISM; SUPPORT; IMMIGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What is the relationship between ideology and international relations (IR)? The extant literature focuses on how the former shapes the latter. Confrontation between Liberalism and Fascism, Communism, and Authoritarianism have sequentially structured IR over the past Century. While such all-encompassing Ideologies may unify the people of different nations in (often opposing) worldviews, liberal/left and conservative/right ideologies can divide citizens within nations. Dimensions of ideology like social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) also shape international attitudes in distinct ways. These individual-level ideologies and their attendant worldviews shape state-level foreign policies and system-level IR (the micro-macro link) through elite decision-making and public opinion. An emerging literature also reverses the causal arrow, exploring how health, terrorism and other system-level threats can shape individual-level ideologies. This review essay should reveal the centrality of political psychology to IR: how ideologies powerfully shape the very worlds that we experience and act upon-and their vital role in driving war and peace.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Thawing Rivalries and Fading Friendships: An Experimental Approach to Rapprochement and Alienation
    Albuyeh, Rod
    Paradis, Mark
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 39 (04) : 811 - 827
  • [2] Foreign policy and the electoral connection
    Aldrich, John H.
    Gelpi, Christopher
    Feaver, Peter
    Reifler, Jason
    Sharp, Kristin Thompson
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 : 477 - 502
  • [3] The other "authoritarian personality"
    Altemeyer, B
    [J]. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 : 47 - 92
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, GRASPING DEMOCRATIC
  • [5] On Solid Ground: Evaluating the Effects of Foundational Arguments on Human Rights Attitudes
    Arves, Stephen
    Braun, Joseph
    [J]. HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW, 2019, 20 (02) : 181 - 204
  • [6] Baum MA, 2015, WAR AND DEMOCRATIC CONSTRAINT: HOW THE PUBLIC INFLUENCES FOREIGN POLICY, P1, DOI 10.1515/9781400866472
  • [7] Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in the Age of Social Media
    Baum, Matthew A.
    Potter, Philip B. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2019, 81 (02) : 747 - 756
  • [8] Baum MatthewA., 2009, WAR STORIES CAUSES C
  • [9] Aiding Strangers: Generalized Trust and the Moral Basis of Public Support for Foreign Development Aid
    Bayram, A. Burcu
    [J]. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS, 2017, 13 (01) : 133 - 153
  • [10] Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 US Federal Elections (and if so, How)?
    Beall, Alec T.
    Hofer, Marlise K.
    Schaller, Mark
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (05) : 595 - 605