An external quality assessment program for von Willebrand factor laboratory analysis: An overview from the European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Foundation

被引:88
作者
Meijer, Piet [1 ]
Haverkate, Frits [1 ]
机构
[1] ECAT Fdn, NL-2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
von Willebrand disease; von Willebrand factor; von Willebrand factor activity; von Willebrand factor antigen; quality control program;
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-947862
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (vWD) is complex and requires a panel of different laboratory tests. Because of this complexity, a proper quality control process is necessary. Since 2003, the European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Foundation has provided an external quality control program for several laboratory tests included in the diagnosis of vWD. Currently, similar to 180 different laboratories participate in this program, of which the vast majority perform both von Willebrand factor (vWF):antigen (Ag) and activity tests. The lowest between-laboratory variation was observed for the vWF antigen assay (10 to 24%), with a better performance for the latex immunoassay (8 to 24%) than the enzyme immunoassay (13 to 25%). Both the ristocetin cofactor activity assay (RCo) and the collagen-binding assay showed a higher between-laboratory variation (20 to 40% and 17 to 29%, respectively). We have observed that the within-laboratory repeatability for normal samples ranged from 0 to 40% for the antigen assay and from 0 to 86% for the ristocetin cofactor activity assay. Normal samples were interpreted correctly by the majority of the participants. However, type 1 vWD samples were wrongly interpreted by 20 to 40% of the participants, which was mainly caused by a discordance in the vWF:RCo/vWF:Ag ratio. It can be concluded that further improvement in the laboratory diagnosis of vWD is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 491
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]   Laboratory diagnosis of congenital von Willebrand disease [J].
Budde, U ;
Drewke, E ;
Mainusch, K ;
Schneppenheim, R .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2002, 28 (02) :173-189
[3]   Von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: an alternative to ristocetin co-factor activity? [J].
Casonato, A ;
Pontara, E ;
Bertomoro, A ;
Sartorello, F ;
Cattini, MG ;
Girolami, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :578-583
[4]  
Favaloro EJ, 1999, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V82, P1276
[5]   Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand's disorder: quality and diagnostic improvements driven by peer review in a multilaboratory test process [J].
Favaloro, EJ ;
Bonar, R ;
Kershaw, G ;
Sioufi, J ;
Hertzberg, M ;
Street, A ;
Lloyd, J ;
Marsden, K .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2004, 10 (03) :232-242
[6]   Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder - Current practice in the Southern Hemisphere [J].
Favaloro, EJ ;
Bonar, R ;
Sioufi, J ;
Hertzberg, M ;
Street, A ;
Lloyd, J ;
Marsden, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 119 (06) :882-893
[7]   A duplex issue: (i) time to re-appraise the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disorder, and (ii) clarification of the roles of von Willebrand factor collagen binding and ristocetin cofactor activity assays [J].
Favaloro, EJ .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2002, 8 (06) :828-831
[8]   Appropriate laboratory assessment as a critical facet in the proper diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disorder [J].
Favaloro, EJ .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2001, 14 (02) :299-319
[9]   Assessment of current diagnostic practice and efficacy in testing for von Willebrand's disorder: results from the second Australasian multi-laboratory survey [J].
Favaloro, EJ ;
Thom, J ;
Baker, R .
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2000, 11 (08) :729-737
[10]  
Favaloro EJ, 2001, AM J HEMATOL, V66, P53, DOI 10.1002/1096-8652(200101)66:1<53::AID-AJH1009>3.3.CO